Teams

Maximum Tennis Development Zone

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 2.5 Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-27vs Sportime HI -ArmadaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Tarangioli / Sylvia Stelly vs Melissa Heery / Rebecca Isa-lacroix7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-19vs Sportime HI - Hit SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesLoretta Lifrieri / S Kasim vs Alisha Vazquez / Magnolia Grossman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-09vs NRRC: Nice RacquettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Levirne / Loretta Lifrieri vs Kerry Tarr / Anne Wagstaff1-6, 3-6
2026-02-26vs WTC: 2.5 Love & DeucesLost 01
L#2 DoublesSylvia Stelly / Mariah Celestine vs Andrea Coe / Erica Dickman-Wilkes4-6, 0-6
2026-02-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Tarangioli / Loretta Lifrieri vs Elizabeth Latino / Kristin Patturelli3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-06vs NRRC: Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLoretta Lifrieri / Rachel Geronemus vs Sara Scanlon / Meghan Donohue3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-20vs WCC: Serve-ivorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Toolan / Loretta Lifrieri vs Karina Verni / Helen Woods4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRachel Geronemus / Thea Stokes vs Lizzy Monaghan / Kristin Kanos1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Levirne / Patricia Toolan vs Susan Benkelman / Pavithra Mandappa1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Tarangioli / Rachel Geronemus vs Martina Cribiore / Krista Friedrich4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.28
Loretta Lifrieri
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Amanda Tarangioli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gia D'Onofrio
published 2.5
Jacqueline Levirne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
S Kasim
published
1.96
Sylvia Stelly
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Mariah Celestine
published
Patricia Toolan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Geronemus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Loretta Lifrieri
32W–71L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Amanda Tarangioli
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Gia D'Onofrio
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Jacqueline Levirne
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
S Kasim
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Sylvia Stelly
3W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Mariah Celestine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Toolan
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Geronemus
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.