Teams

Casper Crew

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · MIXED - 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-26vs Cheyenne Mixed DubsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Bowron / John Yost vs Daniel Plowman / Claire Enriquez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Broderick / Rob Pettigrew vs Aaron Enriquez / Kristy Hammond3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmber McCormick / Ryan McCormick vs Virgil Bellini / Katherine Plowman6-0, 6-3
2025-04-25vs Cheyenne Mixed DubsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Bowron / John Yost vs Aaron Enriquez / Claire Enriquez3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmber McCormick / Ryan McCormick vs Virgil Bellini / Brittany Wardle6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJackie Broderick / Rob Pettigrew vs Daniel Plowman / Priscilla Gill2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-25vs Cheyenne Mixed DubsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Bowron / John Yost vs Priscilla Gill / Daniel Plowman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmber McCormick / Rick Cumbow vs Brittany Wardle / Aaron Enriquez0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Broderick / Rob Pettigrew vs Kristy Hammond / Virgil Bellini6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED - 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Casper Crew2163968
2Cheyenne Mixed Dubs12361483

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jackie Broderick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amber McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
John Yost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Bowron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Cumbow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rob Pettigrew
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tim Hough
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Pettigrew + Jackie Broderick213 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Bowron + John Yost213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jackie Broderick
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amber McCormick
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Yost
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Bowron
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rick Cumbow
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rob Pettigrew
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan McCormick
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Hough
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.