Teams

Cheyenne Mixed Dubs

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · MIXED - 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-26vs Casper CrewLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Plowman / Claire Enriquez vs Rachel Bowron / John Yost6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAaron Enriquez / Kristy Hammond vs Jackie Broderick / Rob Pettigrew6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVirgil Bellini / Katherine Plowman vs Amber McCormick / Ryan McCormick0-6, 3-6
2025-04-25vs Casper CrewLost 02
L#1 DoublesAaron Enriquez / Claire Enriquez vs Rachel Bowron / John Yost6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVirgil Bellini / Brittany Wardle vs Amber McCormick / Ryan McCormick3-6, 4-6
2025-04-25vs Casper CrewSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrittany Wardle / Aaron Enriquez vs Amber McCormick / Rick Cumbow6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKristy Hammond / Virgil Bellini vs Jackie Broderick / Rob Pettigrew1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED - 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Casper Crew2163968
2Cheyenne Mixed Dubs12361483

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Daniel Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
Aaron Enriquez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Brittany Wardle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Katherine Plowman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Priscilla Gill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Claire Enriquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kristy Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Virgil Bellini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Plowman + Katherine Plowman2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Plowman
31W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Aaron Enriquez
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brittany Wardle
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Katherine Plowman
35W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Priscilla Gill
36W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Claire Enriquez
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristy Hammond
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Virgil Bellini
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.