Teams

SHC-Brecke

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.22 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Kim Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Pam Edinger
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.02
Karen Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Xia Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.67
Anne McCroskey
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Launi Smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Lisa Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Donna Feuerherdt
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Linda Graham
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-11-12Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAnne McCroskey / Donna Feuerherdt vs Cynthia McPhee / Lisa Handley6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Klein / Linda Graham vs Kim Stevens / Mariniah Prendergast6-1, 7-6
2023-11-04Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Xia Wu vs Deborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLauni Smith / Jennifer Schmelling vs Becky Rey / Jill Sather7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Fosberg / Linda Graham vs Naomi Steinberg / Cindy Rushall6-4, 6-2
2023-10-21Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Graham / Donna Feuerherdt vs Sandy Garry / Chris Ramsower-Pearlstein6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnne McCroskey / Linda Fosberg vs Jill Lee / Janelle Laurila6-2, 7-6
2023-10-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Fosberg / Donna Feuerherdt vs Kristin Fudalla / Marie Picard7-5, 7-5
2023-10-08Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Hill / Xia Wu vs Trina Denson / Amy Leahy6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne McCroskey / Karen Sullivan vs Mary Anderson / June Wu6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Feuerherdt / Launi Smith vs Kimberly Quach / Rebecca Redding6-4, 6-0
2023-10-07Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Hill / Xia Wu vs Cathrine Olander / Yuko Hopman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne McCroskey / Karen Sullivan vs Michelle Donato / Julie Brown6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauni Smith / Rhonda Kessinger vs Deanna Lautenbach / Sue Gregoire6-3, 6-1
2023-09-30Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Fosberg / Kim Hill vs Lisa Handley / Jennifer Devoe7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Anne McCroskey vs Linda Lovett / Elise Orban6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Feuerherdt / Launi Smith vs Cynthia McPhee / Stacy Hawkins Parker7-5, 6-3
2023-09-23Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnne McCroskey / Xia Wu vs Jill Sather / Tami Oglesby6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauni Smith / Rhonda Kessinger vs Lisa Lyon / Cindy Rushall6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Feuerherdt / Linda Graham vs Lisa Provost / Naomi Steinberg6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kim Hill
94W–59L career
0%98%2%
4.26
4.5
Pam Edinger
42W–30L career
9%91%0%
4.06
4.5
Karen Sullivan
62W–81L career
12%88%0%
4.02
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
33%67%0%
3.92
4
Anne McCroskey
34W–52L career
6%94%0%
3.67
4
Launi Smith
50W–54L career
17%81%2%
3.65
4
Lisa Klein
28W–39L career
7%93%0%
3.65
4
Donna Feuerherdt
65W–68L career
13%87%0%
3.60
4
Linda Graham
76W–76L career
35%65%0%
3.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.