Teams

Wolf/40/3.5/M/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Shrev

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-27vs Armstrong/40/3.5/M/POTCWon 31
L#1 DoublesHai Nguyen / Heath Crager vs William OBrien / Brennan Bernard2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChris Schroeder vs Paul Cavell6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlbert Hardison / Anthony Jeter vs Marcus Taylor / Troy Adkins6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJay Johnson / Patrick Omundson vs Raymond Jarvis / Stephen Craig6-3, 6-0
2025-03-20vs Shaw/40/3.5/M/SHTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Petree / Hai Nguyen vs John Smith / Rick Holland6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChris Schroeder vs John Shaw6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlbert Hardison / Anthony Jeter vs Jeff Howard / Robert Burleson6-1, 6-4
2025-02-27vs Furqueron/40/3.5/M/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Barrow / Heath Crager vs Patrick Doyal / Tim Stuart4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesScott Wolf / Josh Hathorn vs Brian Furqueron / Jesse Waller7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Hatfield / Robbie Malone vs Blake Bunnett / Steven Anderson0-6, 2-6
2025-02-13vs Armstrong/40/3.5/M/POTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesThomas O'Brien / Dhu Thompson vs Chris Singletary / William OBrien0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChris Schroeder vs Scott Sutton6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJimmy Beebe / Hai Nguyen vs Troy Adkins / Brennan Bernard4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesScott Wolf / Patrick Omundson vs Keith Knox / Kris Jackson6-2, 6-4
2025-02-06vs Shaw/40/3.5/M/SHTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesHeath Crager / Robbie Malone vs Rick Holland / Alan Cox6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesClifford Ashton vs John Shaw6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTroy Potter / Jeff Addison vs Robert Burleson / Jeff Howard7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlbert Hardison / Anthony Jeter vs Bob Patterson / Michael Hudson6-2, 6-2
2025-01-23vs Furqueron/40/3.5/M/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Hatfield / Troy Potter vs Patrick Doyal / Vince Truong2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Petree / Jimmy Beebe vs Slattery Johnson / Jesse Waller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesScott Barrow / Dhu Thompson vs Blake Bunnett / Steven Anderson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Anthony Jeter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Heath Crager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Thomas O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Dhu Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Chris Schroeder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Scott Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
James Hatfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Brad Petree
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Patrick Omundson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Jimmy Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Robbie Malone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Albert Hardison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Clifford Ashton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Jeff Addison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Hathorn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Troy Potter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Hardison + Anthony Jeter404 matchesnot enough data
Dhu Thompson + Robbie Malone213 matchesnot enough data
Heath Crager + James Hatfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anthony Jeter
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Heath Crager
28W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Thomas O'Brien
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Dhu Thompson
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Chris Schroeder
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Scott Wolf
25W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
James Hatfield
13W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Brad Petree
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Patrick Omundson
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jimmy Beebe
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Robbie Malone
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Albert Hardison
24W–7L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Clifford Ashton
13W–24L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jeff Addison
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Josh Hathorn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Troy Potter
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.