Teams

Payne Park Marina

2026 Sarasota Trilevel Spring Weeknight · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-08vs Laurel Oak Tri to Love AgainLost 12
L#1 DoublesYudi Carpenter / Jenny Lexhed vs Cindy Rosenberg / Emily Weitekamp5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Shaheen / Tatiana Agafonova vs Alicia Cohler / Lynne Powell4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPhyllis Weitzner / Pamela Huelster vs Shannon Pastras / Madeline Crosby6-2, 6-4
2026-06-01vs PP Evening NarwhalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesYudi Carpenter / Kathryn Paige Ciano vs Theresa Watson / Deanna Allard6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarina Yeliseyev / Paula Shaheen vs Thao Ross / Rebecca Zion7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhyllis Weitzner / Jackie Fox vs Ada Suneson / Meredith Ansenberger3-6, 4-6
2026-05-21vs TPC Trilevel RossLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Reichert / Patricia Keilman vs Lisa Temple / Nicole Thompson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTatiana Agafonova / Paula Shaheen vs Lori Madden / Monica Barth6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Huelster / Inna Pomares vs Lorraine Forzani / Susan Mihm4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-04vs Wellen Park LansdaleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Paige Ciano / Lisa Reichert vs Kimberly Gacso / Kristin Barkow6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Beckwith / Tatiana Agafonova vs Katherine Gould / Tina McAtee6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Huelster / Phyllis Weitzner vs Patricia Crepeault / Clare Imrie7-6, 6-2
2026-04-27vs LWR Cherry RanchersLost 03
L#1 DoublesYudi Carpenter / Kathryn Paige Ciano vs Nia Esposito / Christine Handel1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Beckwith / Paula Shaheen vs Noelle Hage / Martha Roberts4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Huelster / Jackie Fox vs DENISE NEVILLE / Sharon Frank6-7, 3-6
2026-04-20vs LWN BautistaWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathryn Paige Ciano / Jenny Lexhed vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Nancy Cope7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTatiana Agafonova / Paula Shaheen vs Ana Bautista / Sheila Weiss6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesInna Pomares / Phyllis Weitzner vs Teresa Knight / Teri Arrington3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-13vs Laurel Oak Tri to Love AgainLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Keilman / Jenny Lexhed vs Jennifer Stroble / Emily Weitekamp3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTatiana Agafonova / Marina Yeliseyev vs Alicia Cohler / Lynne Powell7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesInna Pomares / Jackie Fox vs Erin Herrick / Carissa DRESSEL5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-06vs PP Evening NarwhalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathryn Paige Ciano / Lisa Reichert vs Alison White / Theresa Watson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarina Yeliseyev / Patricia Beckwith vs Thao Ross / Bev Murray7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhyllis Weitzner / Pamela Huelster vs Margaret McNamara / Gillian Kaye7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Kathryn Paige Ciano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Yudi Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Lisa Reichert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Jenny Lexhed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Patricia Keilman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Patricia Beckwith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Paula Shaheen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Marina Yeliseyev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Tatiana Agafonova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Phyllis Weitzner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Pamela Huelster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Inna Pomares
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Jackie Fox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Huelster + Phyllis Weitzner4162% games+10.7% vs expected
Marina Yeliseyev + Tatiana Agafonova3250% gamesnot enough data
Marina Yeliseyev + Paula Shaheen224 matchesnot enough data
Marina Yeliseyev + Phyllis Weitzner303 matchesnot enough data
Tatiana Agafonova + Paula Shaheen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathryn Paige Ciano
103W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Yudi Carpenter
218W–131L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
Lisa Reichert
111W–129L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Jenny Lexhed
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Patricia Keilman
88W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Patricia Beckwith
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Paula Shaheen
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Marina Yeliseyev
40W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Tatiana Agafonova
27W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Phyllis Weitzner
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
2.98
Pamela Huelster
12W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Inna Pomares
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jackie Fox
63W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.