Teams

LWN Bautista

2026 Sarasota Trilevel Spring Weeknight · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-08vs TPC Trilevel RossLost 03
L#1 DoublesElsa Trefil / Kelly Depalo vs Tambra Ford / Fabiola Beckmann6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Knight / Erin Neufelder vs Monica Barth / Lori Madden1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Arrington / Carolyn Card vs Lorraine Forzani / Cyndi Weitzel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-01vs Wellen Park LansdaleWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Cope / Elsa Trefil vs Kimberly Gacso / Kristin Barkow6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Neufelder / Julie Eriksen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTeri Arrington / Carolyn Card vs Patricia Crepeault / Stephanie Chapman6-4, 6-2
2026-05-18vs LWR Cherry RanchersLost 12
L#1 DoublesElsa Trefil / Kelly Depalo vs Karen Spiegel / Natalie Bloch1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Hallam / Ana Bautista vs Krista Sprungman / Kassandra Hugill3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Knight / Carolyn Card vs Joani Crean / Katherine Chandra6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-04vs Laurel Oak Tri to Love AgainLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Depalo / Sheila Weiss vs Cindy Rosenberg / Emily Weitekamp1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAna Bautista / Emily Ebers vs Sandra Poston / Lynne Powell5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Arrington / Carolyn Card vs Erin Herrick / Shannon Pastras5-7, 5-7
2026-04-27vs PP Evening NarwhalsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Depalo / Nancy Cope vs Jacqueline Dezelski / Danielle Sherrill6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Eriksen / Sheila Weiss vs Bev Murray / Thao Ross7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTeresa Knight / Carolyn Card vs Margaret McNamara / Ada Suneson4-6, 3-6
2026-04-20vs Payne Park MarinaLost 12
W#1 DoublesMari-Ann Kucharek / Nancy Cope vs Kathryn Paige Ciano / Jenny Lexhed6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAna Bautista / Sheila Weiss vs Tatiana Agafonova / Paula Shaheen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Knight / Teri Arrington vs Inna Pomares / Phyllis Weitzner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-13vs TPC Trilevel RossLost 12
W#1 DoublesMari-Ann Kucharek / Mary Gill vs Lisa Temple / Nicole Thompson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Eriksen / Erin Neufelder vs Monica Barth / Lori Madden4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Arrington / Teresa Knight vs Pam Howard / Lorraine Forzani3-6, 2-6
2026-04-06vs Wellen Park LansdaleLost 12
W#1 DoublesElsa Trefil / Kelly Depalo vs Charlotte Hartman / Katherine Gould6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTammy Hallam / Ana Bautista vs Tina McAtee / Jolie Walecka4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTeri Arrington / Teresa Knight vs Stephanie Chapman / Rita Guidry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Mari-Ann Kucharek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Mary Gill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Kelly Depalo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Nancy Cope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Elsa Trefil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Sheila Weiss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Julie Eriksen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Erin Neufelder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Emily Ebers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Ana Bautista
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Tammy Hallam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Teresa Knight
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.98
Teri Arrington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Carolyn Card
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Gill + Mari-Ann Kucharek6168% games+12.0% vs expected
Kelly Depalo + Elsa Trefil1542% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Knight + Teri Arrington2449% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Depalo + Tammy Hallam4158% gamesnot enough data
Julie Eriksen + Erin Neufelder3254% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Depalo + Julie Eriksen213 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Hallam + Sheila Weiss213 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Hallam + Ana Bautista033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mari-Ann Kucharek
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Mary Gill
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Kelly Depalo
74W–104L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Nancy Cope
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Elsa Trefil
71W–103L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Sheila Weiss
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Julie Eriksen
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Erin Neufelder
48W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Emily Ebers
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Ana Bautista
29W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Tammy Hallam
68W–118L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Teresa Knight
8W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Teri Arrington
15W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Carolyn Card
2W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.