Teams

ALPINE HILLS CW5.5A

2021 COMBO · Women 5.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.11 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Tanya Gacs
published
3.56
Katja Gagen
published
3.41
Allison Carlson
published 3.5
3.40
Wendy Mcadam
published
3.39
Kate Fenwick
published
3.27
Shannon Basch
published
3.22
3.19
Joi Deaser
published
3.15
Caren Taylor
published 3.5
3.13
Sally Aalfs
published
3.10
Tina Molumphy
published
3.06
Mary Nam
published
2.90
Aimee Armsby
published 3
2.89
Sally Ann Reiss
published
2.86
Brandy Bridges
published 3
2.77
Emily Lopez
published 3
2.72
Alisha Senescu
published 3
2.72
Elise Gabrielson
published 3
2.66
Jami Worthington
published 3
2.62
Samantha Bufton
published
2.61
Melissa Land
published
2.34
Ann Crevelt
published 3
Rachel Berg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Mcadam + Tina Molumphy3253% games+4.1% vs expected
Aimee Armsby + Samantha Bufton3257% gamesnot enough data
Susan Miller Hornbeek + Tina Molumphy213 matchesnot enough data
Allison Carlson + Kate Fenwick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanya Gacs
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.03
Katja Gagen
33W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Allison Carlson
15W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Wendy Mcadam
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.40
Kate Fenwick
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.39
Shannon Basch
10W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Susan Miller Hornbeek
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Joi Deaser
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Caren Taylor
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Sally Aalfs
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
Tina Molumphy
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Mary Nam
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Aimee Armsby
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Sally Ann Reiss
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Brandy Bridges
43W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Emily Lopez
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Alisha Senescu
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Elise Gabrielson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Jami Worthington
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
Samantha Bufton
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
0%19%81%
2.62
Melissa Land
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Ann Crevelt
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
2.34
Rachel Berg
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.