Teams

OC LLW NBTC - Ron - S/S 11

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 4.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-31vs OC Palisades - Colleen - Sat1Won 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Watson / Benjamin Pugh vs Brandon Hovard / Samantha Mills6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Gonzalez / Scott Tiernan vs Joshua Snyder / Colleen Scanlon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnja Clarke / Ken Clarke vs Michael Stuhley / Susie Duffy6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Anja Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
Benjamin Pugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Billy McCoy
published 5
BO HU
published 4.5
Carl Flint
published 4.5
4.25
4.22
Jenna van der Meyden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Erin Schoenbaum
published
4.19
Christa Abraham
published 4.5
4.16
Stacey Kwasizur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Scott Tiernan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Kristen Bendanna
published
3.98
Rachel Tran
published
Ken Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ron Schoenbaum
published
Scott Frick
published
Teresa Chow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diederick van der Meyden + Jenna van der Meyden2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anja Clarke
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Benjamin Pugh
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Billy McCoy
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
BO HU
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Carl Flint
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Diederick van der Meyden
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Jenna van der Meyden
78W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Erin Schoenbaum
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Christa Abraham
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Stacey Kwasizur
62W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Scott Tiernan
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Kristen Bendanna
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Rachel Tran
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Ken Clarke
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ron Schoenbaum
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Frick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Chow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.