Teams

OC Palisades - Colleen - Sat1

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-14vs OC LNRC - AviWon 21
L#1 DoublesMeghan Ball / Tom Duddy vs Avinash Mehta / Amy Caldwell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesColleen Scanlon / Kyle Laskie vs Josh Johnson / Stephanie Tarzia6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Porter / Paul Kincaid vs Justin Green / Stacy Ison6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-31vs OC LLW NBTC - Ron - S/S 11Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandon Hovard / Samantha Mills vs Pamela Watson / Benjamin Pugh4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoshua Snyder / Colleen Scanlon vs Andrea Gonzalez / Scott Tiernan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Stuhley / Susie Duffy vs Anja Clarke / Ken Clarke1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Julie Orris
published
4.46
Lajla Feichter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.39
Colleen Scanlon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Jennifer Murdy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Brandon Hovard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Joshua Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Kelly Ford
published
3.98
Michael Stuhley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Paul Kincaid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Jason Bobb
published
3.94
Samantha Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Michael McGee
published
Kyle Laskie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Meghan Ball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Gill
published
Susie Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Duddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Orris
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Lajla Feichter
74W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
4.46
4.5
Colleen Scanlon
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Jennifer Murdy
44W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Brandon Hovard
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Joshua Snyder
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
Kelly Ford
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
Michael Stuhley
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Paul Kincaid
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Jason Bobb
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.95
Samantha Mills
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
Michael McGee
26W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Kyle Laskie
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Ball
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Gill
44W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susie Duffy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tom Duddy
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.