Teams

OC LNRC - Avi

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

18 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-14vs OC Palisades - Colleen - Sat1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAvinash Mehta / Amy Caldwell vs Meghan Ball / Tom Duddy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJosh Johnson / Stephanie Tarzia vs Colleen Scanlon / Kyle Laskie2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Green / Stacy Ison vs Emily Porter / Paul Kincaid1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.03
Kathy Archibald
published
4.47
Danielle D'Amico
published 4.5
4.36
Alissa Ahlman
published 4.5
4.21
Eugene Tran
published
4.17
Nikki Fermin
published
4.13
Justin Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Michael Archibald
published
4.04
Noh Jin Park
published
4.03
Avinash Mehta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Brian Richardson
published 4.5
3.86
Ayako Hasegawa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Stephanie Tarzia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Lily Pham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
3.55
Stacy Ison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Izabela Mijic
published
Leonard Wang
published
Matt Dubow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Avinash Mehta + Daniela Schardinger314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Archibald
17W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.03
4.5
Danielle D'Amico
91W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Alissa Ahlman
28W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.36
Eugene Tran
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.21
Nikki Fermin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Justin Green
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Michael Archibald
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Noh Jin Park
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Avinash Mehta
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
4.5
Brian Richardson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Ayako Hasegawa
64W–28L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Stephanie Tarzia
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.78
Lily Pham
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Daniela Schardinger
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Stacy Ison
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Izabela Mijic
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leonard Wang
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Dubow
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.