Teams

SS-D RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-28vs HG REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Moeller / Meg Benedik vs Diane Liberty / Debbie Lepetsos6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Hogue / Nancy Railey-Borchelt vs Suzette Loving / Karen Miller3-6, 3-6
2024-05-20vs SS-LT NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeg Benedik / Jennifer Moeller vs Jennifer Swiecki / Stacey Feltman4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNatalie Borchelt vs Christine Gish6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Jane Lundwall vs Katherine Barnes / Stevie Vencil3-6, 2-6
2024-05-13vs SS-H REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeg Benedik / Jennifer Moeller vs Kari Graham / Debbie Sabato6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNatalie Borchelt / Nancy Railey-Borchelt vs Linda Backus / Lori Lee6-2, 6-4
2024-05-06vs HW GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeg Benedik / Jennifer Moeller vs Holly Shrewsbury / Mellenie Goebel2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Nancy Hogue vs JULIE HANCOCK / Vivian Perla6-2, 6-1
2024-04-29vs SS-LT REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Borchelt / Meg Benedik vs Kelly Kinder / Caroline Landgraff6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Toni Lapp vs Stella Madrid / Denise Hawkins7-5, 6-2
2024-04-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Natalie Borchelt vs Stacey Williams / Lisa Nelson7-5, 6-3
2024-04-15vs LTFC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Moeller / Meg Benedik vs Meg Braun / Lauren Hillary6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatalie Borchelt vs Tracy Klein6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Jane Lundwall vs Debbie Murphy / Myrna Sobernheim7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Meg Benedik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Natalie Borchelt
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Jennifer Moeller
published
2.92
Shannon Pirrie
published
2.67
Traci Henry
published
2.54
Nancy Railey-Borchelt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.51
Jane Lundwall
published
2.49
Nancy Hogue
published
2.36
Mia Bowick
published
Toni Lapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Hogue + Nancy Railey-Borchelt1542% games−1.7% vs expected
Nancy Hogue + Traci Henry4249% games−4.3% vs expected
Nancy Railey-Borchelt + Natalie Borchelt5548% games−6.0% vs expected
Jane Lundwall + Traci Henry3251% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Hogue + Shannon Pirrie3261% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Railey-Borchelt + Shannon Pirrie4161% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Railey-Borchelt + Toni Lapp044 matchesnot enough data
Jane Lundwall + Nancy Hogue213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meg Benedik
46W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Natalie Borchelt
25W–14L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Jennifer Moeller
30W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
Shannon Pirrie
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Traci Henry
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Nancy Railey-Borchelt
45W–72L career · 7 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jane Lundwall
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Nancy Hogue
21W–24L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
Mia Bowick
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.36
Toni Lapp
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.