Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Brink

2021 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-02vs OC - FVTC - SusieLost 01
L#3 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Cheryl Saunders vs Susie Ruiz / Mary Thomas0-6, 2-6
2021-11-21vs OC Cute on the Court - MakLost 01
L#2 DoublesSue Magnall / Annemarie Garrett vs Brittany Shieh / Michele Savoie0-6, 3-6
2021-11-07vs OC CMTC - DeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Lloyd / Sue Magnall vs Jody Brennan / Rikki Scharnell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanna McConnell / Rosalinda Fazio vs Stacy Tzur / Terri Rasmussen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Tish Wong vs Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Cheryl Smith2-6, 2-6
2021-10-15vs OC NBTC - DonnaLost 01
L#3 DoublesJosephine Garrett / Rosalinda Fazio vs Jeannine Sandling / Allison Herman3-6, 1-6
2021-10-01vs OC Great Park - NanLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Cheryl Saunders vs Lily Yu / Linda Luk6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanna McConnell / Sue Magnall vs Risa Chung / Mary DeVlugt6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2021-09-24vs OC Coto de Caza - karenWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Nerie Ivers vs Ann Rommel / Marilyn Bartholomew7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-09-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesCheryl Gates / Rosalinda Fazio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Judy Lee Vogt
published 4.5
3.81
Cheryl Gates
published 4
Christine Callas
published 4
3.64
Janna McConnell
published
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.47
Sue Magnall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Karen Brink
published
Laura Chasin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Gates + Janna McConnell3548% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Judy Lee Vogt
48W–36L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Janna McConnell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 7 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sue Magnall
33W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
Karen Brink
12W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
Laura Chasin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.