Teams

BWilhelm

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-17vs NRodriguezLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeredith Ellison / Cheri Kivisto vs Cassie Pence / Heather Sherwood2-6, 2-6
2022-04-28vs JHobgoodWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheri Kivisto / Kathryn Crowder vs Lauren Johns / Sara Fitzpatrick6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeigh Barter / Jill Lewis vs Mary Ingram / Beth Pegram6-2, 6-3
2022-04-25vs LMcReeLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Lewis / Cheri Kivisto vs Sarah Ferguson / Rossi Evans4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Aumer / KELLI McGuire vs Emily Andino / Katherine King3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-04vs KBlevinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheri Kivisto / KELLI McGuire vs Rhian Sigman / Vina Jordano6-1, 6-1
2022-03-28vs KLevineLost 01
L#2 DoublesShannon Aumer / Katie Sweet vs Elizabeth Carroll / Kelly Thompson5-7, 1-6
2022-03-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Pakela / Shannon Aumer vs Haley Coble / Kelly Coble7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Skylar Poole
published
3.87
Leigh Barter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.03
Cheri Kivisto
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Barbara Wilhelm
published 3
2.40
Lisa Pakela
published
2.19
Susan Furr
published
2.17
Shannon Aumer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.83
Jenn Bollman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Pakela + Jenn Bollman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Skylar Poole
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.01
4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
3
Cheri Kivisto
92W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Barbara Wilhelm
55W–49L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
Lisa Pakela
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%77%23%
2.40
Susan Furr
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Shannon Aumer
27W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17
Jenn Bollman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.