Teams

Jhaveri

2024 Tri-Level Metro · 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.58 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-01vs Eastern/Choy/4.0TriMLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Le / Sandro Battaglia vs Robert Flowers / Brandon Steer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmish Jhaveri / Timothy Wojcik vs Eduardo Mere / Blaz Slamic0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Silberberg / Lawrence Ng vs Matthew Velasco / Surinder Singh3-6, 0-6
2024-04-28vs CohenWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Le / Benjamin Muschol vs Wei Xie / Devan McDaniel6-2, 6-3
2024-04-24vs BindlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Le / Roni Dotan vs Chris Pham / Daniel Bindler0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJosiah Eberhart / Thomas Rinaldi vs Eric Drath / Chase Grubman7-5, 6-2
2024-04-21vs Bhagwagar/LeeLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Muschol / Peter Le vs Daniel Rabinovich / Hitoshi Kiyokawa2-6, 2-6
2024-04-15vs Amin/LekserLost 02
L#2 DoublesTomer Peer / John Liu vs Hasnain Khan / Joshua Schwartz0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Silberberg / Neil Dharia vs Ernest Mai / Rene Paran1-6, 1-6
2024-03-21vs TamSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmish Jhaveri / Josiah Eberhart vs Luis Bracamontes / Chris Spargo6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLawrence Ng / Tomer Peer vs Sean Philip / Jordon Jew1-6, 3-6
2024-03-14vs ExcelsiorLost 12
L#1 DoublesPeter Le / Roni Dotan vs Julian Yarmouth / Alin Haruray2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNicholas Tam / Sandro Battaglia vs Kevin Ni / Ryan Chang6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNeil Dharia / David Thomasevich vs Fangru Jiang / Mahir Eusufzai6-4, 6-3
2024-03-07vs Lyder/DeMeoWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Rinaldi / Josiah Eberhart vs Paul Haydon / Sean Glickenhaus6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Raymond Borno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Roni Dotan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Benjamin Muschol
published 4
3.52
Josiah Eberhart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Thomas Rinaldi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Peter Le
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Minsu Cho
published
3.18
Nicholas Tam
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Sandro Battaglia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Amish Jhaveri
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Matthew Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Neil Dharia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Silberberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
David Thomasevich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Adam Lichtenstein
published
Lawrence Ng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Wojcik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tomer Peer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raymond Borno + Roni Dotan5448% games+0.4% vs expected
Amish Jhaveri + Nicholas Tam1734% gamesnot enough data
Nicholas Tam + Minsu Cho1444% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Rinaldi + Josiah Eberhart303 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Tam + Sandro Battaglia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Raymond Borno
113W–120L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Roni Dotan
125W–89L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Benjamin Muschol
21W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Josiah Eberhart
38W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Thomas Rinaldi
115W–106L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Peter Le
14W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.29
Minsu Cho
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Nicholas Tam
30W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Sandro Battaglia
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Amish Jhaveri
24W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Matthew Scott
31W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.87
Neil Dharia
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
David Silberberg
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
David Thomasevich
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
Adam Lichtenstein
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lawrence Ng
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Wojcik
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tomer Peer
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.