Teams

Tam

2024 Tri-Level Metro · 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.38 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-02vs ExcelsiorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshwin Venkat / Robert Hettleman vs Kevin Ni / Alin Haruray6-3, 5-5
L#2 DoublesEddy Park / Richard Wolffe vs Andre Sulmers / Yuchen Wan2-6, 2-6
2024-04-24vs ImperialLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshwin Venkat / Zachary Marshall vs Timothy Pham / Dylan Cauwels3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEddy Park / Max Freeman vs Jonathan Tien / Mike Latshaw3-6, 2-6
2024-04-21vs Eastern/Choy/4.0TriMWon 20
W#2 DoublesJordon Jew / TK Kong vs Eric Lantz / Teddy Miller7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShiva Sachdeva / Richard Wolffe vs Felix Hui / Er Xie6-3, 6-1
2024-04-18vs Lyder/DeMeoLost 12
L#1 DoublesVlad Diaconita / Ashwin Venkat vs Marco Duenas / Michael DeMeo3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesZachary Marshall / Eddy Park vs Paul Haydon / Marc Zeitoun5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShiva Sachdeva / Richard Wolffe vs Marcos Sueiro / Omar Abdel-Hafez6-3, 7-5
2024-03-29vs BindlerWon 21
W#1 DoublesZachary Marshall / Ashwin Venkat vs Chris Pham / Qing Hui Tan6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChris Spargo / Max Freeman vs Eric Drath / Marcin Rojek0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJordon Jew / TK Kong vs Christopher Bertinelli / Harry Figgie6-2, 6-1
2024-03-27vs Bhagwagar/LeeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshwin Venkat / Vlad Diaconita vs JEHAN BHAGWAGAR / Hitoshi Kiyokawa1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChris Spargo / Luis Bracamontes vs Michael Lipson / Shien Lee3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-21vs JhaveriSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLuis Bracamontes / Chris Spargo vs Amish Jhaveri / Josiah Eberhart1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSean Philip / Jordon Jew vs Lawrence Ng / Tomer Peer6-1, 6-3
2024-03-13vs SiasLost 02
L#1 DoublesVlad Diaconita / Ashwin Venkat vs Jacob Walker / Benjamin Sweeney2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Spargo / Eddy Park vs Vinit Akolkar / Dennis Slade5-7, 0-6
2024-03-08vs Amin/LekserLost 03
L#1 DoublesZachary Marshall / Eddy Park vs Patrick Tsai / Jude Chan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChris Spargo / Josh Lefkowitz vs Tariq Habib / David Alfonso0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Tam / Kevin Quach vs Bradley Faskowitz / Adrian Chan2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Craig Knittle
published 3.5
Ashwin Venkat
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Chris Spargo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Sean Philip
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Richard Wolffe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Eddy Park
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Peter Kung
published
John Tam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jordon Jew
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Josh Lefkowitz
published
Kevin Quach
published
Luis Bracamontes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Max Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Hettleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shiva Sachdeva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
TK Kong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Vlad Diaconita
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordon Jew + TK Kong9160% games+9.0% vs expected
Richard Wolffe + Peter Kung314 matchesnot enough data
Sean Philip + John Tam033 matchesnot enough data
Ashwin Venkat + Vlad Diaconita033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Knittle
18W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Ashwin Venkat
10W–7L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Chris Spargo
8W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sean Philip
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Richard Wolffe
28W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Eddy Park
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Kung
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
John Tam
24W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jordon Jew
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Josh Lefkowitz
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Quach
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Luis Bracamontes
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Max Freeman
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Hettleman
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shiva Sachdeva
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
TK Kong
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vlad Diaconita
2W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.