Teams

GEPTA/55&over/8.0W/Tan/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Hope Perez
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 4.5
3.76
Gloria Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.76
Allison Deputy
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.64
Ernestina Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.56
Estela Loy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Isela Rayon
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jeanette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kerry Lore
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Linda Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Lori DeLisser
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
MarieJosee Lefebvre
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Patricia Alvarez
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Sabrina Aguilar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Selena Solis
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ursula Morawietz
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Yolanda Miranda
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Perez + MarieJosee Lefebvre121150% games+2.4% vs expected
Jeanette Tan + MarieJosee Lefebvre141551% games+0.2% vs expected
Estela Loy + Ursula Morawietz5364% games−3.4% vs expected
Estela Loy + Yolanda Miranda4247% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Lori DeLisser5070% gamesnot enough data
Selena Solis + Lori DeLisser1442% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Yolanda Miranda314 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Jeanette Tan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hope Perez
43W–44L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
4
Gloria Gomez
62W–37L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Allison Deputy
70W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Ernestina Herrera
12W–20L career · 10 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Estela Loy
69W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Isela Rayon
57W–46L career · type A · 24 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Jeanette Tan
39W–51L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Lore
81W–78L career · 42 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Gomez
30W–41L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori DeLisser
94W–74L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
MarieJosee Lefebvre
103W–76L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Alvarez
83W–75L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sabrina Aguilar
41W–33L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ursula Morawietz
39W–28L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yolanda Miranda
63W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.