Teams

NJ YELLOW

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaggie Gomer / Kathleen Harvey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-13vs MC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Brown / Maggie Gomer vs Tina Atchley / Rebecca BaanHofman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Stanley / Kay Newman vs Kelly Dobson / Lorrie Johnson5-7, 2-6
2023-06-06vs RCC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathleen Harvey / Nancy Santmyer vs Emily Miller / Chrissy Hasek1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Brown / Maggie Gomer vs Erin Abramson / Meghan Bigelow7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-30vs NJ PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesKay Newman / Karen Stanley vs Susan Miller / Karen Kirby3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Harvey / Nancy Santmyer vs Mary Elizabeth Frederick / Barb McEahern2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Brown / Maggie Gomer vs Jessica Peterson / Elizabeth LaBelle6-7, 3-6
2023-05-23vs HIW PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathleen Harvey / Karen Stanley vs Kristine Stump / Lori Royal6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKay Newman / Kathy Campbell vs Jayne McGarry / Amy Fletcher3-6, 3-6
2023-05-16vs MC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Harvey / Nancy Santmyer vs Anya Civitella / Kimberly Hitchcock1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Campbell / Kay Newman vs JULIE Danielson / Laura Frei0-6, 3-6
2023-05-09vs MC YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaggie Gomer / Kay Newman vs Nora Tucker / Kelly Dobson0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Heather Roberts
published
2.83
Karen Stanley
published
2.35
Kay Newman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.24
Kathleen Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
1.91
Maggie Gomer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Harvey + Maggie Gomer4839% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Roberts
19W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Karen Stanley
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
2.5
Kay Newman
73W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Kathleen Harvey
144W–265L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Maggie Gomer
50W–117L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.