Teams

RCC GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-20vs MC YELLOWLost 01
L#3 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Mandy Sutton vs Amy Hank / Nora Tucker3-6, 2-6
2023-06-13vs NJ PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Miller / Chrissy Hasek vs Deena Green / Mary Elizabeth Frederick6-3, 6-1
2023-06-06vs NJ YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Miller / Chrissy Hasek vs Kathleen Harvey / Nancy Santmyer6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllyson Shimer / Erika Oakes vs Shirley Willard / Heather Roberts6-3, 6-3
2023-05-23vs MC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Miller / Chrissy Hasek vs Karen Bent / Paige Doherty6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErika Oakes / Meghan Bigelow vs Laura Frei / JULIE Danielson1-6, 5-7
2023-05-16vs MC YELLOWWon 10
W#3 DoublesAllyson Shimer / Erika Oakes vs Amy Hank / Jillian Clark6-4, 6-3
2023-05-09vs NJ PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Emily Miller vs Deena Green / Mary Elizabeth Frederick6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMandy Sutton / Erika Oakes vs Jessica Peterson / Karen Kirby2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Chrissy Hasek
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
2.41
Allyson Shimer
published 3
2.34
Mandy Sutton
published
2.19
Erika Oakes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Erin Abramson
published
Meghan Bigelow
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chrissy Hasek
85W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Catherine Dansdill
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Allyson Shimer
10W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
Mandy Sutton
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Erika Oakes
21W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
Erin Abramson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meghan Bigelow
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.