Teams

RBW-Armellino

2024 Adult 18 & Over · Open Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJackson Cobb / Connor Vordale vs Josh Basha / Michael Costello6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-28vs NWW-FC-TaisLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Armellino / Jackson Cobb vs Ciprian Tais / Theodore McDonald3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-04-07vs NWW-FC-TaisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackson Cobb / Luke Sarausad vs Michael Costello / Samir Iftikhar3-6, 1-6
2024-03-31vs NWW-NTC-FoleyLost 01
L#1 SinglesJackson Cobb vs Piers Foley2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Jackson Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
Donny Baugh
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.75
Maxim Shmotolokha
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.72
Daniel Armellino
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.71
Aman Manji
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.68
Connor Vordale
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.64
Luke Sarausad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Alexander Calpagiu
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.38
Avery Howard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Armellino + Alexander Calpagiu8653% games+5.9% vs expected
Daniel Armellino + Aman Manji2353% games+2.6% vs expected
Alexander Calpagiu + Donny Baugh5647% games+1.8% vs expected
Daniel Armellino + Donny Baugh5554% games+0.3% vs expected
Avery Howard + Alexander Calpagiu2343% games−5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jackson Cobb
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.81
5
Donny Baugh
83W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Maxim Shmotolokha
35W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
4.75
5
Daniel Armellino
137W–89L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.72
5
Aman Manji
25W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.71
5
Connor Vordale
76W–50L career · 10 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.68
Luke Sarausad
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Alexander Calpagiu
141W–100L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Avery Howard
47W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.