Teams

SDNC 3.0WD The Clausby (2:1)/ Vassey- Watson

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC WD Holiday · SDNC - Women- 3.0 (Mon

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesBridy Oreshack / Erinn Hanson vs Kerri Giesen / Hope Jara7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLuba Kagan / Diane Severson vs Katherine Boles / Meredith Vytopil6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSofia Alessio / Diane Severson vs Erika Daniels / Jennifer Vanvoorst3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBridy Oreshack / Erinn Hanson vs KARLA BACKHOFF / Andrea Khan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Severson / Lory Fisher vs Dana McCrary / Mirna Rivera6-7, 6-7
2025-11-10vs SDNC 3.0WD El Camino/ FinemanWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Severson / Lory Fisher vs Donna Chivers / Candy Chesnut6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesErinn Hanson / Ashley Muncey vs Katie Keen / Dawn Reichert3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Severson / Luba Kagan vs Debbie Kuntz / Marcela Flores6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 3.0 (Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Bridy Oreshack
published 3.5
2.92
Gillian Schmitz
published
2.91
Erinn Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Diane Severson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Lory Fisher
published
2.82
2.79
Luba Kagan
published
2.69
Sheena Badani
published
2.52
Jill Mash
published
2.49
Jennifer DeBiasi
published
Jennifer Flack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Severson + Lory Fisher5161% gamesnot enough data
Diane Severson + Erinn Hanson134 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Vassey-Watson + Erinn Hanson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bridy Oreshack
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Gillian Schmitz
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Erinn Hanson
32W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Diane Severson
43W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
Lory Fisher
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
Nicole Vassey-Watson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Luba Kagan
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Sheena Badani
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jill Mash
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Jennifer DeBiasi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jennifer Flack
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.