Teams

SDNC 3.0WD El Camino/ Fineman

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC WD Holiday · SDNC - Women- 3.0 (Mon

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesDonna Chivers / Laurie Schmid vs Isabel Palmer / Jori Tulkki1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCandy Chesnut / Deborah Fineman vs Tammy Farrow / Jang Hauh3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLara Dye / Donna Chivers vs Terra Adams / Carolyn Knoll-Yenor3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Penley / Lara Dye vs Laura de Seroux / Mirna Rivera3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLara Dye / Kim Friedrichsen vs Julie Thunder / Rita Zitterman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Lott-schwartz / Candy Chesnut vs Elizabeth Boone / Leslie Zuccarini1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Schmid / Donna Chivers vs April Johnson / Meredith Vytopil6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesDonna Chivers / Candy Chesnut vs Diane Severson / Lory Fisher4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 3.0 (Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Deborah Fineman
published 3.5
2.79
2.77
Wendy Fanucchi
published
2.75
Dianne Pollock
published 3
2.71
Nicole Fowler
published
2.70
Lara Dye
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Laurie Schmid
published
2.63
Lauren Penley
published
2.56
Kim Thorne
published
2.53
Donna Chivers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Candy Chesnut
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.47
Kim Friedrichsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candy Chesnut + Nicole Fowler224 matchesnot enough data
Donna Chivers + Candy Chesnut033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Fineman
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Hannah Lott-schwartz
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Wendy Fanucchi
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dianne Pollock
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Nicole Fowler
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Lara Dye
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Laurie Schmid
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Lauren Penley
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Kim Thorne
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
3
Donna Chivers
5W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Candy Chesnut
11W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Kim Friedrichsen
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.