Teams

SDNC 3.0WD Candy Cane Crushers @RV/ Meyer

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC WD Holiday · SDNC - Women- 3.0 (Mon

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-15vs SDNC 3.0WD El Camino/ FinemanWon 10
W#2 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Wendy Hsiao vs Wendy Fanucchi / Nicole Fowler6-2, 7-6
L#1 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Almira Niciu vs Felicia Kappes / Nellwyn Voorhies6-4, 0-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Jing Zeng vs Sally Myungok Yeem / Andrea Martel2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Wendy Hsiao vs Donna Golden / Lauren Whitfield1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlmira Niciu / Michelle Mullen vs Amy Selbach / Melissa Kaminsky2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Almira Niciu vs Sheena Badani / Jill Mash6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Isabel Palmer vs Julie Thunder / Jennifer Vanvoorst6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShawna Saponjic / Almira Niciu vs Monica Burnett / Deidre Watson4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesChrystal Meyer / Isabel Palmer vs Lisa Oliver / Lorena Maquera6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlmira Niciu / Jing Zeng vs Cristina Gerardi / Nahomi Kato4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesStephanie Kourie / Chrystal Meyer vs Carolyn Knoll-Yenor / Jeana Marvin6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 3.0 (Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Isabel Palmer
published
2.96
Jori Tulkki
published
2.90
Chrystal Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.90
Wendy Hsiao
published
2.81
Jing Zeng
published
2.80
Almira Niciu
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Michelle Mullen
published
2.69
Stephanie Kourie
published
2.60
Clara Justus
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chrystal Meyer + Jing Zeng5256% games+9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Isabel Palmer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jori Tulkki
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Chrystal Meyer
94W–95L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Wendy Hsiao
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Jing Zeng
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Almira Niciu
10W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Michelle Mullen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Stephanie Kourie
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.69
3
Clara Justus
1W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.