Teams

HRCA GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.64 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-03vs PH BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesCarey Devin vs Melanie Lundberg7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-27vs KC BLACKWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarey Devin vs Elizabeth Low6-1, 6-3
2021-05-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarey Devin vs Laura Kern6-0, 6-2
2021-05-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarey Devin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-29vs CCC BLUEWon 10
W#2 SinglesCarey Devin vs Karissa Savage6-1, 6-2
2021-04-24vs PH REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarey Devin vs Kristin Overton7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Carey Devin
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.70
Karie Lehigh
published 4
3.70
Michelle Millet
published
3.27
Jane Jussila
published 3.5
3.27
Amy Keller
published 3.5
3.26
Colleen Thompson
published 3.5
Audra Calzaretta
published 3.5
3.17
Danielle Butler
published 3.5
Ileen Cummiskey
published
Ruby Fast
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Thompson + Ruby Fast6074% games+13.0% vs expected
Carey Devin + Michelle Millet7458% games+10.4% vs expected
Amy Keller + Ruby Fast13958% games+5.3% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Audra Calzaretta5359% games+3.9% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Amy Keller9257% games+3.4% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Jane Jussila13954% games+1.3% vs expected
Ileen Cummiskey + Danielle Butler7452% games−0.9% vs expected
Jane Jussila + Audra Calzaretta7354% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carey Devin
71W–77L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Karie Lehigh
75W–63L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
Michelle Millet
83W–52L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Jane Jussila
128W–68L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Keller
87W–47L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Colleen Thompson
29W–26L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Audra Calzaretta
26W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Butler
119W–67L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.17
Ileen Cummiskey
34W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ruby Fast
61W–29L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.