Teams

Samuell Grand/Lopez-Rogers X9.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & over MIXED Sunday · X9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.44 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesElise Jeffery / Nicolas Yoshida vs William Shaw / Ashley Longoria3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJorge Tirado / Meg Lohr vs Constance Alexander / Scott Anders1-0
2025-07-20vs Cooper/Noel X9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesManuel Lopez / Ilona Serchenko vs Sebastian Langdon / Elizabeth Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGale Dunleavy / Jorge Tirado vs Kathryn Smith / Michael Hopkins2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElise Jeffery / Phong Nguyen vs Ethan Rice / Abigail Mendoza4-6, 4-6
2025-06-29vs Greenhill/Murphy X9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Stone / Brannon Perkison vs Seth Harris / Tara Murphy2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTraci Boddie / Jeffrey Duffey vs Sonia Moorthy / Michael Kelly3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlexa Mallard / Jake Williams vs Nick Strohla / Teri Ware5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-27vs LifeTime Plano/Pho-Johnson X9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesElyssa Ducret / Manuel Lopez vs Julie Gibson / Sumesh Chopra3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTraci Boddie / Jeffrey Duffey vs Maki Berman / Seth Giertz6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTanya Musick / Michael Mabe vs Astrid Perez / Blake Vo2-6, 1-6
2025-06-22vs Garland/Smith X9.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesTraci Boddie / Brannon Perkison vs Katherine Smith / Hunter Scammahorn4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicolas Yoshida / Elyssa Ducret vs Alexandra Turck / Matt Childers7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Rogers / Jake Williams vs Heather Turck / Son Tran6-3, 7-6
2025-06-08vs SMU/Lu X9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMeg Lohr / Jake Williams vs Colton Rupkey / Christina Cung2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElise Jeffery / Nicolas Yoshida vs Hannah Park / Jarod Sweetland6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlexa Mallard / Michael Mabe vs Victoria Turck / Freedom Wynn3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · X9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1North Texas Racquet Club/Longoria X9.06014412136
2SMU/Lu X9.05112616151
3Cooper/Noel X9.04211716153
4Greenhill/Murphy X9.03310820159
5LifeTime Plano/Pho-Johnson X9.02451326181
6Samuell Grand/Lopez-Rogers X9.01551327185
7Garland/Smith X9.00661227191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ilona Serchenko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.54
Jake Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.31
Michael Mabe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.28
Traci Boddie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Elyssa Ducret
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Elise Jeffery
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Nina Reinert
published
4.17
Jorge Tirado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Jeffrey Duffey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Brannon Perkison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Meg Lohr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.98
Gale Dunleavy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Claire Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Alexa Mallard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Christine Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Tanya Musick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nicolas Yoshida
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicolas Yoshida + Elise Jeffery033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ilona Serchenko
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Jake Williams
8W–11L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.54
Michael Mabe
32W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
4.31
Traci Boddie
34W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Elyssa Ducret
2W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Elise Jeffery
52W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Nina Reinert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Jorge Tirado
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Jeffrey Duffey
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Brannon Perkison
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
Meg Lohr
53W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Gale Dunleavy
16W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4.5
Claire Stone
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Alexa Mallard
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Christine Rogers
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Tanya Musick
30W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Nicolas Yoshida
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.