Teams

DiSanti-2.5-GC

2025 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 2.5 W

5 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-22vs Barnard-2.5-JXNLost 03
L#1 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Lindsey Wiseman1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Olivia Barnard0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Amanda Carter2-6, 2-6
2025-02-22vs Hanson-2.5-PBLost 02
L#2 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Crystie Aultman3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Kelsea Weldon2-6, 2-6
2025-02-22vs Langford-2.5-PBLost 03
L#1 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Kennedi Fantroy1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Yancy Popicg0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Katie Love Owen6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-02-22vs Barnes-2.5-JXNLost 03
L#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Ellie Boutot2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Temekia Jackson4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs BRITTANY MORALES3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Langford-2.5-PB40102790
2Hanson-2.5-PB31841093
3Barnard-2.5-JXN22751086
4Barnes-2.5-JXN135714111
5DiSanti-2.5-GC0401224143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Katy Boyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Stephenie Baker
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Tracy Jackson-Wilson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.25
Lacey Paquin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Mary Anne DiSanti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Paquin + Stephenie Baker191852% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Boyer
37W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
0%64%36%
2.46
Stephenie Baker
54W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Tracy Jackson-Wilson
29W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Lacey Paquin
26W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Mary Anne DiSanti
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.