Teams

Hanson-2.5-PB

2025 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 2.5 W

4 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-22vs Langford-2.5-PBLost 12
W#1 SinglesKelsea Weldon vs Hannah Taninbaum6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCandace Baye vs Kennedi Fantroy6-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesCrystie Aultman vs Chelle Langford1-6, 2-6
2025-02-22vs DiSanti-2.5-GCWon 30
W#1 SinglesCandace Baye vs Rebecca Powell6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCrystie Aultman vs Stephenie Baker6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKelsea Weldon vs Lacey Paquin6-2, 6-2
2025-02-22vs Barnard-2.5-JXNWon 21
W#1 SinglesCandace Baye vs Olivia Barnard6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCrystie Aultman vs Amanda Carter1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKelsea Weldon vs Winky Newman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-22vs Barnes-2.5-JXNWon 21
L#1 SinglesCrystie Aultman vs Ellie Boutot0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKelsea Weldon vs Kari Thomas6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCandace Baye vs Robynne Shields6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Langford-2.5-PB40102790
2Hanson-2.5-PB31841093
3Barnard-2.5-JXN22751086
4Barnes-2.5-JXN135714111
5DiSanti-2.5-GC0401224143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kelsea Weldon
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.77
Candace Baye
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Crystie Aultman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.36
Amanda Hanson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsea Weldon + Candace Baye314 matchesnot enough data
Candace Baye + Crystie Aultman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsea Weldon
42W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Candace Baye
40W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Crystie Aultman
27W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Amanda Hanson
15W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.