Teams

KY/LEX/Parrish/Morrow

2025 USTA COMBO LEAGUE 40 & OVER LEXINGTO · 7.5 ADULT WOMEN

18 players · average NTRP 3.60 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-23vs KY/LEX/Molina/CastleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLana Stephens / Erin Azbell vs Leslie Russ / Hiroko Nakata3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Parrish / Jordan Reeves vs Laurie Larkin / Kenda Moore6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrooks Lundy / Julia Hollon vs Whitney Byard / Sarah Delahanty2-6, 4-6
2025-08-28vs KY/LEX/Molina/CastleLost 12
W#1 DoublesLily Le / Jeramie Brooke Stanley vs Sarah Delahanty / Anne Faulconer6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLana Stephens / Jennifer Alexander vs Laurie Larkin / Kenda Moore6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Parrish / Emily Pernice vs Lisa Castle / Whitney Byard6-0, 3-3
2025-08-16vs KY/LEX/Molina/CastleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLily Le / Brooke Marnitz vs Laurie Larkin / Connie Bishop6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Parrish / Erin Azbell vs Grace McGonigle / Sarah Knight6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPat Miller / Jeramie Brooke Stanley vs Leslie Russ / Lisa Castle1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Camille Morrow
published 4
3.88
Lily Le
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Katie Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Malissa McAlister
published
3.77
Rhonda Miller
published
3.71
Lana Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Julia Hollon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Erin Azbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Ruth Anna Swacker
published
3.42
Cynthia Yeiser
published 3.5
3.41
Erin Brester
published
3.35
Brooke Marnitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Emily Pernice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Jordan Reeves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brooks Lundy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine Richmond
published 3.5
Jeramie Brooke Stanley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lindsey Kretz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Azbell + Jordan Reeves15361% games+11.2% vs expected
Katie Parrish + Camille Morrow10461% games+3.3% vs expected
Cynthia Yeiser + Emily Pernice4259% games+0.0% vs expected
Erin Brester + Malissa McAlister314 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Miller + Lana Stephens123 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Yeiser + Catherine Richmond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camille Morrow
22W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Lily Le
47W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Katie Parrish
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Malissa McAlister
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Rhonda Miller
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Lana Stephens
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Julia Hollon
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Erin Azbell
23W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Ruth Anna Swacker
24W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Cynthia Yeiser
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Erin Brester
19W–21L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Brooke Marnitz
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Emily Pernice
29W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Jordan Reeves
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Brooks Lundy
1W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Richmond
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeramie Brooke Stanley
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Kretz
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.