Teams

LTC: ACE BANDAGES: Trompke/Stauber

2025 WMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesLisa Riel / Nicole Malloy vs Elizabeth Varner / Elizabeth Maher6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarie Sattler / Patricia Sullivan vs Patricia Clayton / Deborah Hardy6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Counter / Cheryl Ruell vs Janet Compton / Ellen Donnelly6-1, 6-4
2025-06-01vs BAY: High Fives:MacColl/HartryWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Malloy / Lisa Riel vs Carol MacColl / Kim DeShields7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Counter / Patricia Sullivan vs Mary Tudryn / Pam Brenner-Newton6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDawn Fleury / Cheryl Ruell vs Lucy Hartry / Evelyn Villa6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesLisa Riel / Patricia Sullivan vs Elizabeth Maher / Elizabeth Varner7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBecky Ayers / Nicole Malloy vs Lynn Paul / Barbara Beaudoin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-19vs BAY: High Fives:MacColl/HartryLost 03
L#1 DoublesValerie Stauber / Patricia Sullivan vs Therese Ross / Susan Anderson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Fleury / Becky Ayers vs Pam Brenner-Newton / Mary Tudryn3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSue Trompke / Kim Counter vs Lucy Hartry / Mina Safizadeh1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-30vs BAY: High Fives:MacColl/HartryLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Malloy / Patricia Sullivan vs Carol MacColl / Kim DeShields4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Counter / Patricia Pancione vs Marianne Vinal / Pam Brenner-Newton7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSue Trompke / Noreen Little vs Mika Inoue / Mary Tudryn1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesLisa Riel / Patricia Sullivan vs Louise Sterling / Elizabeth Varner6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSue Trompke / Becky Ayers vs Elizabeth Maher / Lynn Paul6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Ruell / Roberta Silverstein vs Maureen Ratigan / Carol York2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BAY: High Fives:MacColl/Hartry5113512136
2LTC: ACE BANDAGES: Trompke/Stauber3310818168
3LTC: Tennis Ballers: Beaudoin/Desroches1541431194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Patricia Pancione
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Lisa Riel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Nicole Malloy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Valerie Stauber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Becky Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Sue Trompke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Marie Sattler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Cheryl Ruell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Dawn Fleury
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Noreen Little
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Kim Counter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roberta Silverstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Southwick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Trompke + Lisa Riel6258% games+7.0% vs expected
Lisa Riel + Nicole Malloy7356% games+3.6% vs expected
Sue Trompke + Marie Sattler5447% games+3.3% vs expected
Valerie Stauber + Lisa Riel17959% games+2.8% vs expected
Dawn Fleury + Nicole Malloy9553% games+1.9% vs expected
Becky Ayers + Nicole Malloy292454% games−0.7% vs expected
Dawn Fleury + Becky Ayers6949% games−1.8% vs expected
Sue Trompke + Valerie Stauber71145% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Pancione
72W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Lisa Riel
73W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Nicole Malloy
66W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Valerie Stauber
140W–114L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Becky Ayers
54W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Sue Trompke
74W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Marie Sattler
79W–98L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cheryl Ruell
87W–106L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Dawn Fleury
37W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Noreen Little
37W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kim Counter
34W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Roberta Silverstein
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Southwick
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.