Teams

LTC: Tennis Ballers: Beaudoin/Desroches

2025 WMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-22vs BAY: High Fives:MacColl/HartryLost 03
L#1 DoublesLouise Sterling / Patricia Clayton vs Marianne Vinal / Therese Ross6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Beaudoin / Noreen Desroches vs Carol MacColl / Kim DeShields1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Compton / Jane O'Riordan vs Evelyn Villa / Mina Safizadeh5-7, 4-6
2025-06-14vs BAY: High Fives:MacColl/HartryLost 03
L#1 DoublesNoreen Desroches / Deborah Hardy vs Carol MacColl / Therese Ross2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Beaudoin / Ellen Donnelly vs Lucy Hartry / Susan Anderson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Compton / Jane O'Riordan vs Mary Tudryn / Mika Inoue0-6, 4-6
2025-06-07vs LTC: ACE BANDAGES: Trompke/StauberLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Varner / Elizabeth Maher vs Lisa Riel / Nicole Malloy4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Clayton / Deborah Hardy vs Marie Sattler / Patricia Sullivan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Compton / Ellen Donnelly vs Kim Counter / Cheryl Ruell1-6, 4-6
2025-05-10vs BAY: High Fives:MacColl/HartryLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Beaudoin / Louise Sterling vs Therese Ross / Susan Anderson0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNoreen Desroches / Maureen Ratigan vs Marianne Vinal / Mika Inoue6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Clayton / Jane O'Riordan vs Lucy Hartry / Mina Safizadeh2-6, 3-6
2025-04-27vs LTC: ACE BANDAGES: Trompke/StauberSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Maher / Elizabeth Varner vs Lisa Riel / Patricia Sullivan6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Paul / Barbara Beaudoin vs Becky Ayers / Nicole Malloy6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-16vs LTC: ACE BANDAGES: Trompke/StauberLost 12
L#1 DoublesLouise Sterling / Elizabeth Varner vs Lisa Riel / Patricia Sullivan1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Maher / Lynn Paul vs Sue Trompke / Becky Ayers4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Ratigan / Carol York vs Cheryl Ruell / Roberta Silverstein6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BAY: High Fives:MacColl/Hartry5113512136
2LTC: ACE BANDAGES: Trompke/Stauber3310818168
3LTC: Tennis Ballers: Beaudoin/Desroches1541431194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deborah Hardy
published 3.5
3.21
Lynn Paul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Elizabeth Varner
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.17
Elizabeth Maher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Noreen Desroches
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Louise Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Carol York
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Barbara Beaudoin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ellen Donnelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jane O'Riordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Compton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Ratigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Clayton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Hardy + Louise Sterling71046% games−6.5% vs expected
Barbara Beaudoin + Patricia Clayton1437% games−10.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Maher + Patricia Clayton2537% games−13.4% vs expected
Noreen Desroches + Barbara Beaudoin1633% gamesnot enough data
Noreen Desroches + Louise Sterling3347% gamesnot enough data
Janet Compton + Carol York3352% gamesnot enough data
Janet Compton + Louise Sterling1448% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Maher + Louise Sterling3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Hardy
29W–68L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Paul
31W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Elizabeth Varner
88W–96L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Elizabeth Maher
121W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Noreen Desroches
59W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Louise Sterling
127W–135L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Carol York
46W–94L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Barbara Beaudoin
20W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Ellen Donnelly
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane O'Riordan
12W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Compton
16W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Ratigan
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Clayton
29W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.