Teams

Glover/NLR/BP

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring 1 · 3.0 Women - Nighttime

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-21vs Moore/West/LR/OCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJann Pharo / Kathy Mascuilli vs Monica Moore / Leah Hart6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCynthia Glover / Robin Dehaven vs Susan Allison / Lisa Moreland7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRuth Mabry / Allison Ramsey vs Marsha Guffey / Vanesa Wood6-4, 7-5
2026-04-16vs RMiller/Conway/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Mascuilli / Shelli Dominick vs Lori Shepard / Rhonda Gray7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Glover / Jann Pharo vs Kara Bloomfield / Stephanie Petray1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Slattery / Ruth Mabry vs Cindy Battisto / Jolene Coop3-6, 5-7
2026-04-12vs Ballard/Sherwood/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoann Privitello / Karen Bryant vs Lisa Ballard / Holly Driver3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Glover / Jann Pharo vs Kathy Wild / Carole George6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Slattery / Robin Dehaven vs Joan Khilling / Melissa Perez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-11vs RMiller/Conway/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJann Pharo / Allison Ramsey vs Kara Bloomfield / Stephanie Petray3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoann Privitello / Carol Slattery vs Robbin Miller / Stephanie Haynes3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Glover / Robin Dehaven vs Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke / Leslie Lamb2-6, 4-6
2026-04-08vs Moore/West/LR/OCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Glover / Ruth Mabry vs Susan Allison / Lisa Moreland5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoann Privitello / Carol Slattery vs Monica Moore / Melissa Buck7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKathy Mascuilli / Karen Bryant vs Christine Summage-West / Leah Hart7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-03-25vs Ballard/Sherwood/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesJann Pharo / Shelli Dominick vs Cindy Cope / Wendie Weare6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Glover / Robin Dehaven vs Holly Driver / Carole George7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Mascuilli / Karen Bryant vs Lisa Ballard / Charleen Francis1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-14vs Crymes/Wenzler/Conway/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Ramsey / Joann Privitello vs Becky Marks / Janet Moore3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Glover / Jann Pharo vs Julie Enderlin / Lisa Loftis6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRuth Mabry / Carol Slattery vs Barbara Barron / Jan Gates6-0, 6-2
2026-02-16vs Crymes/Wenzler/Conway/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesRuth Mabry / Shelly Hampel vs Alysanne Crymes / Bihu Huang3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Mascuilli / Shelli Dominick vs Kimberlee Finne / Jan Gates6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCynthia Glover / Robin Dehaven vs Becky Marks / Janet Moore0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Nighttime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Ruth Mabry
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
2.87
Jann Pharo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Kathy Mascuilli
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.86
Shelli Dominick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Joann Privitello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Carol Slattery
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Cynthia Glover
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Robin Dehaven
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Shelly Hampel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Allison Ramsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Glover + Jann Pharo4256% games+6.3% vs expected
Robin Dehaven + Cynthia Glover3545% games+4.7% vs expected
Robin Dehaven + Jann Pharo3358% gamesnot enough data
Jann Pharo + Kathy Mascuilli303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Mabry
12W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jann Pharo
15W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Kathy Mascuilli
13W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Shelli Dominick
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Joann Privitello
20W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Carol Slattery
4W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Cynthia Glover
11W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Robin Dehaven
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Shelly Hampel
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Allison Ramsey
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.