Teams

Crymes/Wenzler/Conway/BP

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring 1 · 3.0 Women - Nighttime

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-18vs RMiller/Conway/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlysanne Crymes / Julie Enderlin vs Kara Bloomfield / Stephanie Petray4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJan Gates / Carla Choate vs Leslie Lamb / Elly Rumbach1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Barron / Mona Churchwell vs Robbin Miller / Stephanie Haynes0-6, 4-6
2026-04-14vs RMiller/Conway/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlysanne Crymes / Julie Enderlin vs Kara Bloomfield / Stephanie Petray1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Loftis / Mona Churchwell vs Leslie Lamb / Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKimberlee Finne / Patti Jo White vs Robbin Miller / Stephanie Haynes1-6, 1-6
2026-03-31vs Ballard/Sherwood/BPLost 12
W#1 DoublesBihu Huang / Kathy Dix Swanson vs Cindy Cope / April Stussy7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatti Jo White / Carla Choate vs Carole George / Sandra Higgins3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Barron / Kimberlee Finne vs Lisa Ballard / Melissa Perez3-6, 4-6
2026-03-29vs Moore/West/LR/OCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlysanne Crymes / Mona Churchwell vs Susan Allison / Vanesa Wood3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Dix Swanson / Julie Enderlin vs Lisa Moreland / Sonda LLoyd6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Loftis / Patti Jo White vs Monica Moore / Melissa Buck3-6, 4-6
2026-03-19vs Moore/West/LR/OCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Loftis / Kimberlee Finne vs Lisa Moreland / Susan Allison1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlysanne Crymes / Barbara Barron vs Christine Summage-West / Monica Moore6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBecky Marks / Carla Choate vs Sonda LLoyd / Vanesa Wood2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-14vs Glover/NLR/BPWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Marks / Janet Moore vs Allison Ramsey / Joann Privitello6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Enderlin / Lisa Loftis vs Cynthia Glover / Jann Pharo2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Barron / Jan Gates vs Ruth Mabry / Carol Slattery0-6, 2-6
2026-03-12vs Ballard/Sherwood/BPWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Dix Swanson / Bihu Huang vs Joan Khilling / Lisa Ballard6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMona Churchwell / Lisa Loftis vs Sandra Higgins / April Stussy6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPatti Jo White / Carla Choate vs Cindy Cope / Charleen Francis2-6, 0-6
2026-02-16vs Glover/NLR/BPWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlysanne Crymes / Bihu Huang vs Ruth Mabry / Shelly Hampel6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKimberlee Finne / Jan Gates vs Kathy Mascuilli / Shelli Dominick1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBecky Marks / Janet Moore vs Cynthia Glover / Robin Dehaven6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women - Nighttime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Moore/West/LR/OC44111331249
2Crymes/Wenzler/Conway/BP3591533237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Becky Marks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Mona Churchwell
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
2.78
Kathy Dix Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Bihu Huang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Alysanne Crymes
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Lisa Loftis
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Barbara Barron
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.48
Kimberlee Finne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Julie Enderlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Jan Gates
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Patti Jo White
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Carla Choate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Loftis + Barbara Barron123 matchesnot enough data
Alysanne Crymes + Barbara Barron123 matchesnot enough data
Jan Gates + Barbara Barron033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Marks
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Mona Churchwell
7W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kathy Dix Swanson
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Bihu Huang
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Alysanne Crymes
9W–26L career · 12 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Lisa Loftis
3W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Barbara Barron
2W–16L career · 11 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Kimberlee Finne
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Julie Enderlin
8W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.47
Jan Gates
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Patti Jo White
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Carla Choate
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.