Teams

LCTA40/Billings/Dunes West

2022 USTA 40 & Over Spring · 40 & over Women - 3.0 Sunday

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & over Women - 3.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Erika Colbrunn
published 3.5
3.12
Denise Barsness
published 3.5
2.99
Anya Kent
published 3
2.96
Neda Smith
published
2.94
Traci Smith
published
2.76
Anne Underkofler
published 3
Elizabeth Thorne
published 3
2.74
2.73
Trudy Billings
published
2.67
Trish Richardson
published
2.63
Deborah Mahoney
published 3
2.52
Teresa Hildebrand
published
2.48
Tamar Dessner
published
2.31
Renee Popovich
published
Allison Cordle
published 2.5
Effie Reilly
published 2.5
Marina Harrison
published
Youlin Diaz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Underkofler + Anya Kent6064% games+8.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Thorne + Denise Barsness4351% games−3.6% vs expected
Trudy Billings + Elizabeth Lierley134 matchesnot enough data
Renee Popovich + Elizabeth Lierley033 matchesnot enough data
Renee Popovich + Effie Reilly033 matchesnot enough data
Trudy Billings + Elizabeth Thorne213 matchesnot enough data
Anne Underkofler + Denise Barsness123 matchesnot enough data
Erika Colbrunn + Anya Kent213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Colbrunn
54W–52L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Denise Barsness
29W–51L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Anya Kent
66W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
Neda Smith
86W–81L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Traci Smith
12W–27L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Anne Underkofler
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Elizabeth Thorne
33W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Lierley
49W–43L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
Trudy Billings
28W–62L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Trish Richardson
27W–29L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Deborah Mahoney
16W–23L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
2.63
Teresa Hildebrand
34W–50L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
Tamar Dessner
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.48
Renee Popovich
6W–32L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
2.31
2.5
Allison Cordle
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Effie Reilly
1W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marina Harrison
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Youlin Diaz
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.