Teams

CUBBERLEY 18AM3.5B

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-24vs RINCONADA PK 18AM3.5CWon 10
W#1 DoublesMao Gao / Jun Qian vs Andrei Elovikov / Artur Gainullin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 18AM3.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesBo Dong / Jun Qian vs Amit Sridharan / Manu Lohiya6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVikas Shah / Tommy Lin vs Jeongsup Shim / Don Sung6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJiye Wu / Yinchao Guo vs Bradford Meiseles / Wenchao Zhou3-6, 2-6
2025-04-20vs CUBBERLEY 18AM3.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Chien / Huan Ren vs Hc Peng / Hideharu Sugizaki7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMao Gao / Nikhil Prakash vs S George Wong / Kosuke Yamada6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Devank Agarwal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Sreedhar Racharla
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.50
Robert Chien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Jun Qian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Huan Ren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Daniel Svensson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Nikhil Prakash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Mao Gao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Tommy Lin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Laxman Subramanian
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
3.32
Edison Huang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Josh Gong
published
3.26
Lixin Yao
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.24
Kausik Misra
published
3.12
Wei Su
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Bo Dong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Jiye Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Yinchao Guo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Jiajing Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Pradeep Rajagopal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jiajing Wang + Bo Dong3443% games−8.5% vs expected
Mao Gao + Jun Qian404 matchesnot enough data
Jiye Wu + Yinchao Guo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Devank Agarwal
23W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Sreedhar Racharla
68W–30L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Robert Chien
33W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jun Qian
23W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Huan Ren
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Daniel Svensson
28W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Nikhil Prakash
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mao Gao
14W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Tommy Lin
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Laxman Subramanian
120W–52L career · 19 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Edison Huang
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Josh Gong
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Lixin Yao
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Kausik Misra
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Wei Su
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Bo Dong
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
Jiye Wu
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Yinchao Guo
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jiajing Wang
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Pradeep Rajagopal
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.