Teams

Pumpkin Smashers 2.5/3.0

Sweater Weather Fall League · Women 3.0

5 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2025-12-28vs Love Served ColdWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Hedges / J Kate Matzgannis vs Jennifer Diane Moseley / KIMBERLY HUTTON BRICKHOUSE6-1, 6-3
2025-12-21vs The Slice GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJ Kate Matzgannis / Suzanne Rich vs Heidi Velazquez / Mica Manson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-12-20vs Floyd Winter 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Wongmanee / J Kate Matzgannis vs Stephanie Wills / Emma Turnbull2-6, 2-6
2025-12-16vs Rackettes OPWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Wongmanee / Suzanne Rich vs Helen Furr / Hillary Nystrom6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-12-14vs Snow MercyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJ Kate Matzgannis / Jill Hedges vs Ashley Eatmon / Diane Klementowich3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-12-07vs Spice & Slice Fall 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Hedges / Suzanne Rich vs Mary Toohey / Cotton Cera4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-12-04vs Love Served ColdWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Hedges / Ximena Foster vs Jennifer Quinn / Katelin Kight3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-25vs The Slice GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesXimena Foster / Suzanne Rich vs Lela Ingram / Heidi Velazquez7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-23vs Rackettes OPLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Foubister / J Kate Matzgannis vs Joyce Smith / Raquel Morrison3-6, 1-6
2025-11-18vs Snow MercyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJ Kate Matzgannis / Suzanne Rich vs Ashley Eatmon / Peggy Stovall1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-16vs Floyd Winter 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Wongmanee / J Kate Matzgannis vs Brie Floyd / Stephanie Wills1-6, 1-6
2025-11-12vs Spice & Slice Fall 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesXimena Foster / Jill Hedges vs Kelly OBrien / Kellie Gearhart2-6, 4-6
2025-11-09vs Love Served ColdWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Wongmanee / Holly Foubister vs Katelin Kight / Jennifer Diane Moseley6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
J Kate Matzgannis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Sarah Wongmanee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Holly Foubister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Jill Hedges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Ximena Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Hedges + Ximena Foster4640% games−6.5% vs expected
Holly Foubister + Sarah Wongmanee224 matchesnot enough data
J Kate Matzgannis + Sarah Wongmanee033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

J Kate Matzgannis
9W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Sarah Wongmanee
24W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42
Holly Foubister
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Jill Hedges
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Ximena Foster
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.