Teams

BCST NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-29vs PH REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Todd / Joe Kroog vs Marc Rakowski / Matt Overton6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRoger Williams / James Brennan vs Jason Wolfe / Jim Martin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-22vs KC-RH TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Barwick / Joe Kroog vs Dan Strietelmeier / David Valenciano7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRoger Williams vs Roger Torres3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Jack Rowley vs Brian Furgason / Andrew Lydens1-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs MC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoger Williams / Steve Monroe vs Steve Connell / JEEYONG PARK6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJack Rowley / David Archuleta vs Philip Lahnert / Kurt Zimmerman0-6, 1-6
2023-04-24vs CCC BLUESplit 11
L#2 DoublesScott Johnston / David Archuleta vs Charles Varnell / Marko Vukovich2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRoger Williams vs Craig Myles6-3, 6-3
2023-04-17vs KC-CC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoger Williams / Joe Kroog vs Andy Sexton / Jon Moore7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Jeff Todd
published
3.00
Roger Williams
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.89
Joe Kroog
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Nate Phillips
published
2.61
Steve Monroe
published
2.52
David Archuleta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.51
James Barwick
published
2.46
Randall Look
published
Jack Rowley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Monroe + Joe Kroog4159% games+8.8% vs expected
Roger Williams + Joe Kroog13260% games+7.2% vs expected
Steve Monroe + Roger Williams3346% gamesnot enough data
Randall Look + James Barwick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Todd
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3
Roger Williams
121W–125L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Joe Kroog
70W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Nate Phillips
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Steve Monroe
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
David Archuleta
36W–121L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%44%56%
2.52
James Barwick
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Randall Look
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jack Rowley
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.