Teams

PH RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-29vs BCST NAVYWon 41
L#1 DoublesMarc Rakowski / Matt Overton vs Jeff Todd / Joe Kroog2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Farncombe vs Michael Williams6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJason Wolfe / Jim Martin vs Roger Williams / James Brennan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBronk Harms vs James Barwick6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Kinnear / Mike Morrison vs Randall Look / Mark Lindel2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-22vs KC-CC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarc Rakowski / Bronk Harms vs Prosper Wang / Jon Moore6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Kinnear / Jason Wolfe vs Bryan DesMarteau / Brad Goulding6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMatt Overton vs Brenden McNamara5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJeff Cottrell / Mike Morrison vs Troy Corrente / John Kesner1-6, 2-6
2023-05-15vs KC-RH TEALWon 41
W#1 DoublesBronk Harms / Mark Picha vs David Valenciano / Mark Garcia6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMatthew Farncombe vs Roger Torres6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarc Rakowski / Brian Kinnear vs Richard Frisz / Alan Harris2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesWilliam Licko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMike Morrison / Jeff Cottrell vs Adelino Sanchez / Dean Ogawa3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-08vs BM GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMark Picha / Matt Overton vs Gary Farmar / Todd Hoffman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrad Weekes vs Andrew Swanson5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Licko / Jim Martin vs Mark Imrie / Alec Hall6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Rakowski / Brian Kinnear vs Andrew Carlson / David Pretzler6-2, 6-1
2023-05-01vs MC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMatt Overton / Marc Rakowski vs Abraham Cruz / Nate Skinner7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBronk Harms vs Erik Hunsinger6-1
L#2 DoublesJason Wolfe / Brian Kinnear vs Kurt Zimmerman / Chris Rudolph6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Morrison / Jeff Cottrell vs John Hartney / Jamie Harvey1-6, 4-6
2023-04-24vs NJ BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesBronk Harms / Mark Picha vs Jeremy Wilder / Tyler Roberts1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Licko vs Gregg Occhiogrosso0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Kinnear / Jason Wolfe vs Steve Young / Ernest Reece2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Farncombe vs Colby Kortum6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMike Morrison / Jeff Cottrell vs Leon Gonzales / Jeremy Riggle3-6, 2-6
2023-04-17vs CCC BLUELost 23
W#1 DoublesMark Picha / Matt Overton vs Jon Leonard / Nick Poulos6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesWilliam Licko vs Bentley Tate6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJason Wolfe / Jim Martin vs Craig Evans / Kent Bassett7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMike Morrison vs Garrett Tripp2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarc Rakowski / Brian Kinnear vs Craig Myles / Ward Cerny6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Bronk Harms
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.02
William Licko
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Jim Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Marc Rakowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Jason Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brad Weekes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeff Cottrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Picha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Overton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Matthew Farncombe
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Mike Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Picha + Matt Overton4161% games+6.7% vs expected
Jim Martin + Marc Rakowski5354% games+0.4% vs expected
Mark Picha + Bronk Harms3259% gamesnot enough data
Jason Wolfe + Jim Martin4162% gamesnot enough data
Mike Morrison + Jeff Cottrell134 matchesnot enough data
Matt Overton + Marc Rakowski224 matchesnot enough data
William Licko + Bronk Harms303 matchesnot enough data
William Licko + Matthew Farncombe033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bronk Harms
69W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.19
3.5
William Licko
96W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jim Martin
43W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
Marc Rakowski
18W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Jason Wolfe
28W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.75
Brad Weekes
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Cottrell
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Picha
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Overton
40W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Farncombe
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Morrison
4W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.