Teams

BM GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-02vs NJ BLUELost 05
L#1 DoublesAdam Gunden / Andrew Swanson vs Tyler Roberts / Jeremy Wilder2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Carlson vs Gregg Occhiogrosso0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMark Imrie / Todd Hoffman vs Todd Hurt / Michael Schirmacher1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Moxon vs John Connelly0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Edwards / Alec Hall vs Paul Rose / Gary Bland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-22vs CCC BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesTodd Hoffman / Alec Hall vs Craig Evans / Nick Poulos1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Swanson vs Steve Paris0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Carlson / Mark Imrie vs Armen Khadiwala / Craig Myles3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGary Farmar vs Ward Cerny6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Pretzler / Charles Edwards vs Mike Miller / Charles Varnell5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-15vs BCST NAVYWon 41
W#1 DoublesMatt Feldman / Jeffrey Moxon vs James Barwick / Steve Monroe3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGary Farmar vs Jeff Todd1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Carlson / Mark Imrie vs Michael Williams / Mark Brown6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTodd Hoffman vs Mark Lindel6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAdam Gunden / Charles Edwards vs Randall Look / James Brennan6-4, 7-6
2023-05-08vs PH REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesGary Farmar / Todd Hoffman vs Mark Picha / Matt Overton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrew Swanson vs Brad Weekes7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMark Imrie / Alec Hall vs William Licko / Jim Martin1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Carlson / David Pretzler vs Marc Rakowski / Brian Kinnear2-6, 1-6
2023-05-01vs KC-RH TEALLost 05
L#1 DoublesCharles Edwards / Andrew Swanson vs Mark Garcia / David Valenciano1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMark Imrie vs Roger Torres3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChris Markley / Adam Gunden vs Curtis Crites / Dan Strietelmeier3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Moxon vs Michael Kelley1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatt Feldman / David Pretzler vs Richard Frisz / Dean Ogawa2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-24vs KC-CC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAdam Gunden / Chris Markley vs Ben Jamtgaard / Brenden McNamara0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAndrew Swanson vs John Kesner6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Carlson / Alec Hall vs Jon Moore / Josh King2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Moxon vs Andy Sexton7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-17vs MC BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesAdam Gunden / Andrew Carlson vs Philip Lahnert / Nate Skinner2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTodd Hoffman vs John Hartney6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlec Hall / Charles Edwards vs Chris Rudolph / Jamie Harvey1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Moxon vs David Atkinson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMark Imrie / Chris Markley vs Abraham Cruz / Steve Connell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Andrew Swanson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Alec Hall
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.93
Jeffrey Moxon
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Todd Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.82
Matt Feldman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Gary Farmar
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Mark Imrie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.34
Andrew Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Adam Gunden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Chris Markley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
David Pretzler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Farmar + Andrew Carlson123 matchesnot enough data
Gary Farmar + Todd Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Carlson + Todd Hoffman123 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Carlson + Mark Imrie213 matchesnot enough data
Todd Hoffman + Jeffrey Moxon123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Moxon + Matt Feldman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Swanson
15W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Alec Hall
19W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Jeffrey Moxon
27W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.93
Todd Hoffman
32W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Matt Feldman
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Gary Farmar
26W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
Mark Imrie
14W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Andrew Carlson
6W–38L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Adam Gunden
4W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Chris Markley
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
David Pretzler
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.