Teams

Brenau-Pinkerton

2025 · 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-03vs Chateau Elan-KupkaLost 02
L#3 DoublesJennifer Parsons / Alicia Winn vs Sonya Watts / April Barrett3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesRobin Carr-Smith / Lisa Lancaster vs Sandra Gardner / Michelle Calvert4-6, 3-6
2025-11-19vs Alberta Banks-CobbSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Parsons / Alicia Winn vs Jamie Bak / Tracee Smith6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#4 DoublesJan Hunter / Pamela McBride vs Jennifer Harvieux / Lori Imhof2-6, 1-6
2025-11-12vs Alberta Banks-JakinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJan Hunter / Alice Beach vs Patricia Brewer / Patti Hendrix-Brown1-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesJennifer Parsons / Alicia Winn vs Ginger Jakins / Danielle Luce3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-05Split 11
L#1 DoublesMary Bell / Robin Carr-Smith vs Mary Casper / Terri Smiley3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Parsons / Alicia Winn vs Maggie Bennett / Christine Allen2-6, 6-2, 6-4
2025-11-02vs City Park-DarbySplit 11
L#2 DoublesLisa Lancaster / Robin Carr-Smith vs Brigitte Reall / Krista Tripp1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Parsons / Alicia Winn vs Polly Bennett / Leslie Watters6-2, 4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kathryn Bettencourt
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
Deatra Bureau
published 3.5
3.24
Alicia Winn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
DeAnna Emborski
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Alice Beach
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #4 Doubles 15% · published 3.5
3.14
Patsy Greer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Stephanie Figueroa
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Amy Turner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.02
Mary Bell
published
3.01
Elcira Pinkerton
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Rebekah Stanford
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Donna Sullivan
published
2.86
Angie Bruce
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.84
Pamela McBride
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 36% · published
Jan Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Robin Carr-Smith
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alice Beach + Patsy Greer8259% games+4.2% vs expected
Jan Hunter + Alice Beach0537% gamesnot enough data
Rebekah Stanford + Pamela McBride224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Turner + Elcira Pinkerton314 matchesnot enough data
Elcira Pinkerton + DeAnna Emborski314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Bell + Kathryn Bettencourt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Bettencourt
54W–15L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.71
3.5
Deatra Bureau
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Alicia Winn
11W–14L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
DeAnna Emborski
24W–35L career · 12 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Alice Beach
17W–28L career · 13 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Patsy Greer
105W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Stephanie Figueroa
10W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amy Turner
8W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Mary Bell
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Elcira Pinkerton
20W–33L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Rebekah Stanford
10W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Donna Sullivan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Angie Bruce
30W–37L career · 15 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Pamela McBride
29W–37L career · 14 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Jan Hunter
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robin Carr-Smith
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.