Teams

Alberta Banks-Jakins

2025 · 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-03Lost 12
W#1 SinglesDanielle Luce vs AMANDA NORTON6-7, 6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDodi Getz / Jenny Poole vs Amanda Watkins / Jeannine Callahan6-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesKeri Morrison / Julie Hodges vs Stacy King / Alycea Hylton0-6, 2-6
2025-11-19Won 10
W#4 DoublesGinger Jakins / Danielle Luce vs Rhonda Kupka / Jennifer Fuller3-6, 6-2, 6-0
2025-11-12vs Brenau-PinkertonLost 01
L#4 DoublesGinger Jakins / Danielle Luce vs Jennifer Parsons / Alicia Winn6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-11-07Split 11
W#1 SinglesDanielle Luce vs Pamela Hoosh7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCathy Kupstas / Keri Morrison vs Margaret Gaines / Ellen Lark6-7, 4-6
2025-11-05vs City Park-DarbyWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatricia Brewer / Beth Arends vs Marrette Winters / Debbie Smith6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesJulie Hodges / Linda Adcock vs Carmen Hermes / Polly Bennett6-2, 6-0
2025-10-22vs Alberta Banks-CobbSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDanielle Luce vs Valentina Ichim6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDodi Getz / Jenny Poole vs Eileen Cobb / Lindsay Hofmann6-4, 5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Gayle Hipple
published
3.55
Lynn Odum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.52
Cathy Kupstas
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Linda Adcock
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Danielle Luce
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Beth Arends
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Patricia Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Maxine Dennis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.38
Lisa Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
3.38
Melissa Drake
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Ginger Jakins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Julie Hodges
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Jenny Poole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Lisa Komanski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Patti Hendrix-Brown
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.01
Dodi Getz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keri Morrison
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Poole + Dodi Getz2351% games+5.9% vs expected
Lisa Dempsey + Linda Adcock13262% games+5.0% vs expected
Patricia Brewer + Patti Hendrix-Brown5355% games+2.7% vs expected
Patricia Brewer + Beth Arends25956% games+0.2% vs expected
Lynn Odum + Lisa Dempsey161055% games−0.6% vs expected
Melissa Drake + Lisa Komanski8753% games−3.3% vs expected
Ginger Jakins + Patricia Brewer8849% games−10.3% vs expected
Melissa Drake + Gayle Hipple1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gayle Hipple
8W–17L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lynn Odum
30W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Cathy Kupstas
22W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Linda Adcock
41W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Danielle Luce
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Beth Arends
28W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Patricia Brewer
56W–33L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Maxine Dennis
25W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Lisa Dempsey
43W–23L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Melissa Drake
25W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Ginger Jakins
19W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Julie Hodges
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.30
Jenny Poole
24W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Lisa Komanski
27W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Patti Hendrix-Brown
12W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Dodi Getz
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
Keri Morrison
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.