Teams

Sports Mall-Jones/Osley

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 8.0M

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-05vs Liberty Park Tennis-BirdWon 21
W#1 DoublesFloyd Gordon / Brad Gause vs Craig Hendrix / Matthew Bennett6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRandy Boyd / Andrew Osborn vs Philip Bossart / Phillip Gillaspy7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTROY GRANGER / Jim Jones vs Steven Allred / Jon Nielson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-28vs Liberty Park Tennis-RockwoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Black / James Payne vs Dave Austin / Peter Hanlon6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRandy Boyd / Martez Banks vs Rob Acevedo / Douglas Swallow7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFloyd Gordon / Jim Jones vs Dennis Ferguson / Gleed Toombes7-5, 6-2
2023-06-14vs Liberty Park Tennis-BirdWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteven Payne / James Payne vs Craig Hendrix / Matthew Bennett6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteven Black / Randy Boyd vs Steven Allred / Jon Nielson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTROY GRANGER / Brad Gause vs Dennis Bird / Phillip Gillaspy6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-RockwoodSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTROY GRANGER / Chuck Russell vs Gleed Toombes / Peter Hanlon6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRod Schmidt / Jim Jones vs Dave Austin / Dennis Ferguson5-7, 5-7
2023-06-07vs Liberty Park Tennis-RockwoodWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteven Payne / James Payne vs Dennis Ferguson / Scott Rockwood6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTROY GRANGER / Randy Boyd vs Peter Hanlon / Dave Austin2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAndrew Osborn / Rod Schmidt vs Rob Acevedo / Douglas Swallow3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-03vs Liberty Park Tennis-BirdWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Osborn / Rod Schmidt vs Steve Atkin / Steve Lucero4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMartez Banks / Brad Gause vs Dennis Bird / William Roeca6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteven Black / Chuck Russell vs Greg Malmberg / Craig Hendrix6-1, 6-1
2023-05-17vs Liberty Park Tennis-RockwoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Payne / Steven Payne vs Rob Acevedo / Douglas Swallow6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMartez Banks / Randy Boyd vs Dave Austin / Peter Hanlon7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFloyd Gordon / Steven Black vs Tom Pinborough / Dennis Ferguson6-3, 6-0
2023-05-03vs Liberty Park Tennis-BirdWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Payne / James Payne vs Craig Hendrix / William Roeca7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaul Muehlmann / Steven Black vs Dennis Bird / Phillip Gillaspy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRod Schmidt / Andrew Osborn vs JB Henriksen / Jon Nielson6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Jones/Osley8019514191
2Liberty Park Tennis-Bird35111331223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Chuck Russell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Martez Banks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Andrew Osborn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
James Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Floyd Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.61
Brad Gause
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Jim Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
TROY GRANGER
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Paul Muehlmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rod Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Steven Black
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Steven Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Payne + Steven Payne351958% games+3.9% vs expected
Floyd Gordon + Brad Gause13359% games+3.7% vs expected
Andrew Osborn + TROY GRANGER81051% games+0.1% vs expected
Andrew Osborn + Jim Jones5451% games−7.2% vs expected
TROY GRANGER + Jim Jones3842% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Osborn + Rod Schmidt4452% gamesnot enough data
Jim Jones + Randy Boyd6256% gamesnot enough data
Floyd Gordon + TROY GRANGER1535% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chuck Russell
93W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Martez Banks
32W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Andrew Osborn
54W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
James Payne
70W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Floyd Gordon
80W–85L career · 9 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Brad Gause
57W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jim Jones
28W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
TROY GRANGER
69W–120L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Paul Muehlmann
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Randy Boyd
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rod Schmidt
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Black
37W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Payne
44W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.