Teams

SD LLW CAP LJ B&TC/ Lucia-Debbie

2026 Adult 40 & Over Capstone League · Capstone Women (Tues

16 players · average NTRP 4.88 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesMillie Yablonicky / Lauren Perl Lancaster vs Kristie Alva / ERIN HUGHES6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rens / Debbie Spence-Nasim vs Sheila Paguyo / Lisa Menante6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLucia Romanov / Julianna Gates vs Teri Stevens / Lisa Crisafulli6-1, 6-1
2026-03-10vs WC SD CAP Tierrasanta TC/ ClaudiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Perl Lancaster / Millie Yablonicky vs Claudia Roehr / Brittany Swenson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Spence-Nasim / Julianna Gates vs Chau Nguyen / Shelby Rubin6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeborah Higa / Lucia Romanov vs Kristin Gibson / Christina Kaus2-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs WC SD CAP Tierrasanta TC/ ClaudiaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulianna Gates / Sanem Ahearn vs Irina Shkov / Kristin Gibson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesColleen Royal / Wendy Caragher vs Christina Kaus / Alexia Palacios-Peters7-5, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMillie Yablonicky / Lauren Perl Lancaster vs Sheila Paguyo / Laurie Smith6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesColleen Royal / Jami Jones vs Kristie Alva / Tiffany Kellogg6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Palmer / Karyn McCartney vs Teri Stevens / ERIN HUGHES6-7, 3-6
2026-02-14vs WC SD CAP Tierrasanta TC/ ClaudiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSanem Ahearn / Debbie Spence-Nasim vs Claudia Roehr / Brittany Swenson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rens / Julianna Gates vs Jenna Boyhan / Shelby Rubin6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJami Jones / Karyn McCartney vs Christina Kaus / Kari Katzenmeier6-7, 6-7
W#1 DoublesSanem Ahearn / Wendy Caragher vs Darice Carnaje / Ana Seelinger6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMillie Yablonicky / Colleen Royal vs Lisa Crisafulli / Teri Stevens6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Spence-Nasim / Jennifer Rens vs Tiffany Kellogg / Allison Sterett6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSanem Ahearn / Carlota P LeFon vs Valerie Tan / Ana Seelinger6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesColleen Royal / Jennifer Rens vs Kristie Alva / Linda Park6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Palmer / Dorian Sailer vs Brenda Barnett / Allison Sterett2-6, 2-6
2026-01-13vs WC SD CAP Tierrasanta TC/ ClaudiaLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Rens / Millie Yablonicky vs Jenna Boyhan / Shelby Rubin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJami Jones / Colleen Royal vs Priscilla Martinez / Brittany Swenson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesUna Davis / Deborah Higa vs Chau Nguyen / Alexia Palacios-Peters4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Capstone Women (Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LLW CAP LJ B&TC/ Lucia-Debbie7118614129
2WC SD CAP Tierrasanta TC/ Claudia44121227215
3SD CAP San Dieguito/ Teri- Kristie1761838260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.04
Millie Yablonicky
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
5.03
Debbie Spence-Nasim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
5.00
Carlota P LeFon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.95
Jami Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.93
Sanem Ahearn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.83
Colleen Royal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Deborah Higa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.20
Dorian Sailer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Anna Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jennifer Rens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Julianna Gates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Karyn McCartney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Perl Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lucia Romanov
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Una Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Caragher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Spence-Nasim + Jami Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Millie Yablonicky + Lauren Perl Lancaster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Millie Yablonicky
71W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
5.04
5
Debbie Spence-Nasim
12W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
5.03
5
Carlota P LeFon
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
5.00
5
Jami Jones
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.95
Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
4.93
5
Colleen Royal
6W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
4.83
5
Deborah Higa
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Dorian Sailer
75W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Anna Palmer
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
4.16
Jennifer Rens
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julianna Gates
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karyn McCartney
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Perl Lancaster
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lucia Romanov
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Una Davis
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Caragher
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.