Teams

WC SD CAP Tierrasanta TC/ Claudia

2026 Adult 40 & Over Capstone League · Capstone Women (Tues

10 players · average NTRP 4.93 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-28vs SD CAP San Dieguito/ Teri- KristieLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrittany Swenson / Claudia Roehr vs Kristie Alva / Tiffany Kellogg6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlexia Palacios-Peters / Chau Nguyen vs Darice Carnaje / Valerie Tan1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Kaus / Kristin Gibson vs Brenda Barnett / Lisa Menante5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesBrittany Swenson / Shelby Rubin vs Katherine Steinberg / Laurie Smith6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Chau Nguyen vs Tiffany Kellogg / ERIN HUGHES6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPriscilla Martinez / Irina Shkov vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-10vs SD LLW CAP LJ B&TC/ Lucia-DebbieLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Brittany Swenson vs Lauren Perl Lancaster / Millie Yablonicky2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChau Nguyen / Shelby Rubin vs Debbie Spence-Nasim / Julianna Gates1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Gibson / Christina Kaus vs Deborah Higa / Lucia Romanov6-2, 6-1
2026-03-01vs SD LLW CAP LJ B&TC/ Lucia-DebbieLost 02
L#1 DoublesIrina Shkov / Kristin Gibson vs Julianna Gates / Sanem Ahearn1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Kaus / Alexia Palacios-Peters vs Colleen Royal / Wendy Caragher5-7, 0-6
2026-02-14vs SD LLW CAP LJ B&TC/ Lucia-DebbieLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Brittany Swenson vs Sanem Ahearn / Debbie Spence-Nasim6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Shelby Rubin vs Jennifer Rens / Julianna Gates2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Kaus / Kari Katzenmeier vs Jami Jones / Karyn McCartney7-6, 7-6
W#1 DoublesShelby Rubin / Brittany Swenson vs Lisa Menante / Sheila Paguyo6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Chau Nguyen vs Kristie Alva / ERIN HUGHES7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Gibson / Priscilla Martinez vs Allison Sterett / Valerie Tan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-01-13vs SD LLW CAP LJ B&TC/ Lucia-DebbieWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Shelby Rubin vs Jennifer Rens / Millie Yablonicky3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Martinez / Brittany Swenson vs Jami Jones / Colleen Royal2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChau Nguyen / Alexia Palacios-Peters vs Una Davis / Deborah Higa6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Kari Katzenmeier vs Lisa Menante / Ana Seelinger6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Gibson / Irina Shkov vs Linda Park / Mary Malhame6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPriscilla Martinez / Christina Kaus vs Teri Stevens / Brenda Barnett6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Capstone Women (Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LLW CAP LJ B&TC/ Lucia-Debbie7118614129
2WC SD CAP Tierrasanta TC/ Claudia44121227215
3SD CAP San Dieguito/ Teri- Kristie1761838260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.89
Claudia Roehr
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.76
Christina Kaus
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.63
Jenna Boyhan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.58
Priscilla Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.57
Brittany Swenson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.55
Shelby Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.53
Irina Shkov
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.34
Alexia Palacios-Peters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Kristin Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kari Katzenmeier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Roehr + Brittany Swenson10364% games+14.8% vs expected
Shelby Rubin + Irina Shkov11165% games+0.4% vs expected
Shelby Rubin + Brittany Swenson4450% games−2.0% vs expected
Jenna Boyhan + Claudia Roehr7755% gamesnot enough data
Shelby Rubin + Jenna Boyhan224 matchesnot enough data
Priscilla Martinez + Jenna Boyhan033 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Roehr + Irina Shkov303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Claudia Roehr
125W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.89
5
Christina Kaus
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Jenna Boyhan
70W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Priscilla Martinez
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Brittany Swenson
80W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.57
5
Shelby Rubin
127W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
5
Irina Shkov
67W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.53
4.5
Alexia Palacios-Peters
93W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
Kristin Gibson
30W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.30
Kari Katzenmeier
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.