Teams

Double Trouble

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-07vs GPTWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Hurt / Helen Lee vs Jennifer Gardner / Alissa Williams5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-05vs Holland/KaghanWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandy Fertig / Susan Hurt vs Jennifer Hanseler / Suanty Kaghan6-4, 6-0
2022-08-03vs CallaghanWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Hurt / Brandy Fertig vs Aime Mitchell / Alison Winfield7-5, 6-3
2022-08-02vs LeeWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandy Fertig / Susan Hurt vs Renee Lee / Heather Lewis6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-01vs RelyeaWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Hurt / Helen Lee vs Pam Rasanen / Heidi Relyea6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-26vs Fletcher-BursiekLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Hurt / Brandy Fertig vs Elizabeth Fletcher / Catherine Bursiek5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandy Fertig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.20
Helen Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Jill Hancock
published 3.5
3.05
Susan Hurt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Hurt + Brandy Fertig4161% games+10.0% vs expected
Susan Hurt + Jill Hancock7359% games+4.0% vs expected
Jill Hancock + Helen Lee6845% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandy Fertig
58W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Helen Lee
45W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jill Hancock
142W–94L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Susan Hurt
60W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.