Teams

PCC RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-06vs VCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Dayton / Jean Shaver vs Diane Kelly / Stephanie Geller6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesBarbara Lyon vs Shelbee Riehl7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRoxanne Blair / Hilary Huckemeyer vs Erika Rippee / Kim Brogus7-6, 6-2
2023-08-30vs CPV BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesRoxanne Blair / Colleen Schwarz vs Elean Gersack / Jill Skinner6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Gavlak vs Marcie Mirbaba6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Dayton / Maria Hush vs Andrea Smart / Karen Lang2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-23vs RRTC PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesJean Shaver / Colleen Schwarz vs Marissa Murray / Sarah Turner6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Cramer vs Pamela Coe6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Dayton / Hilary Huckemeyer vs Susan Kim / Elizabeth Luce3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-16vs CCV REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesKari Matthews / LeAnne Wukovits vs Amy Anema / Beth Hoffman6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBarbara Lyon vs Kristin Chapman6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Blair / Laura Dayton vs Buffy Ransom / Erin Miller1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-09vs PRC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeAnne Wukovits / Adrienne Cramer vs Stephanie Enright / Lori Lee6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKari Matthews vs Emily Carter2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Hush / Jean Shaver vs Amber Harris / Sarah Hughes6-3, 6-4
2023-08-02vs SS-LT PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeAnne Wukovits / Kari Matthews vs Sara Haynes / Brooke Wolf6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKelly Gavlak vs Audrey Simkins6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesColleen Schwarz / Jean Shaver vs Carol Berg / Angie Van Wyk7-6, 6-3
2023-07-26vs PRKR REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeAnne Wukovits / Maria Hush vs Laura Hunter / Kristen Warnick6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Cramer vs Lisa Mullins6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Gavlak / Hilary Huckemeyer vs Vicky M Martin / Kristin Wiedmaier3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RHCC YELLOW601536107
2CR-B GREEN6113818173
3SKY GOLD5213818165
4PRC PURPLE5212922168
5LEBTC BLACK5212929201
6MVCC GOLD4313816132
7CM GOLD4312921190
8KNO PURPLE4312923177
9PCC RED3412920180
10EM PINK34101123185
11RRTC PURPLE34101126193
12KC-RH YELLOW2410816149
13GR BLACK2471123177
14VC RED2591226185
15HW NAVY2561531225
16HG YELLOW1651633200
17WC WHITE1661533228
18PRKR BLUE1621939239
19GPTC NAVY0741734221

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
LeAnne Wukovits
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Maria Hush
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Laura Dayton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Roxanne Blair
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Barbara Lyon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kelly Gavlak
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Adrienne Cramer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Hilary Huckemeyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Colleen Schwarz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jean Shaver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kari Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LeAnne Wukovits + Kari Matthews10263% games+8.8% vs expected
Laura Dayton + Jean Shaver10261% games+7.8% vs expected
Hilary Huckemeyer + Laura Dayton2448% games+7.8% vs expected
Maria Hush + LeAnne Wukovits5071% games+6.1% vs expected
Barbara Lyon + Maria Hush5259% games+6.1% vs expected
Adrienne Cramer + Laura Dayton7950% games+4.0% vs expected
Roxanne Blair + Colleen Schwarz2348% games+0.9% vs expected
Kelly Gavlak + Laura Dayton15854% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
LeAnne Wukovits
80W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Maria Hush
128W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Laura Dayton
98W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Roxanne Blair
42W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Barbara Lyon
36W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Kelly Gavlak
74W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Adrienne Cramer
50W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Hilary Huckemeyer
41W–73L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Colleen Schwarz
49W–84L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Jean Shaver
46W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kari Matthews
29W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.