Teams

Team 14 Lothliam

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.94 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-19vs Team 7 Westwood WolfpackLost 01
L#1 DoublesTapleigh Niethamer / Emily Geckle vs Jacqueline Diaz / Rachel Kim6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-28vs Team 2 McLean RacqueteersWon 10
W#1 DoublesTapleigh Niethamer / Emily Geckle vs Lena Brandenburg / Anita Wasan7-5, 6-4
2024-06-14vs Team 5 Deuces WildWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Paduano / Tapleigh Niethamer vs Jihan Bahhur / Tracye Duffin6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Emily Geckle
published 3
3.10
Sarah Helou
published 3
3.09
Tapleigh Niethamer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Stephanie Paduano
published
2.92
Ann Wyborski
published 3
2.86
Ann Bauer
published 3
2.75
Anna Benson
published 3
2.75
Cari McBride
published 3
2.73
Taylor Lothliam
published
2.66
Mary Leigh Morrison
published
2.65
Jacquelyn McVey
published 3
2.38
Katie Hunter
published
2.35
Erin Prentice
published 2.5
2.28
Marcie Tross
published
Julia Maggiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Paduano + Tapleigh Niethamer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Geckle
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Sarah Helou
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Tapleigh Niethamer
31W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
Stephanie Paduano
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Ann Wyborski
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Ann Bauer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Anna Benson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Cari McBride
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Taylor Lothliam
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Mary Leigh Morrison
8W–29L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Jacquelyn McVey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Katie Hunter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Erin Prentice
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.35
Marcie Tross
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
Julia Maggiano
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.