Teams

LCTA40/Zetrouer/MPR

2022 STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-31vs LCTA40/Daniel/MPRWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Frain / Jennifer Keith vs Cassandra Andrus / Kim Shaw6-4, 6-2
2022-07-25vs LCTA40/Young/LTPDIWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Frain / Jennifer Keith vs Erin Grimm / Angela Clark7-5, 6-4
2022-07-18vs LCTA40/Bright/DICWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Frain / Tamara Hale vs Tammy West / Whitney Walsh7-6, 6-1
2022-07-11vs LCTA40/Mulholland/MPRLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Frain / Elaine Herbst vs Wendy Sharp / Claire le Cheminant2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Marcia Dickman
published
3.66
Amy Frain
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Lori Cameron
published
3.49
Tamara Hale
published
3.39
Jennifer Keith
published
3.25
Beth Hasty
published 3.5
3.07
Jill Cross
published
3.02
Cindy Hill
published 3.5
2.92
Emma Shuman
published 3.5
2.86
Denyse Barkley
published 3
2.83
Elaine Herbst
published 3.5
2.72
Elaine Bodine
published 3
Leisa Fingar
published
Linda Costello
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Dickman + Leisa Fingar81053% games+3.1% vs expected
Denyse Barkley + Elaine Herbst2550% games+3.0% vs expected
Jill Cross + Cindy Hill5256% games−3.4% vs expected
Jill Cross + Emma Shuman2745% games−9.1% vs expected
Elaine Herbst + Emma Shuman2633% games−9.2% vs expected
Cindy Hill + Denyse Barkley5842% games−10.9% vs expected
Jill Cross + Elaine Herbst123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Hill + Emma Shuman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcia Dickman
48W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Amy Frain
42W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Lori Cameron
18W–28L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Tamara Hale
32W–27L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Jennifer Keith
101W–57L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Beth Hasty
30W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jill Cross
25W–39L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cindy Hill
19W–30L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Emma Shuman
9W–38L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Denyse Barkley
42W–86L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3.5
Elaine Herbst
23W–55L career · type A · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Elaine Bodine
11W–35L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Leisa Fingar
11W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Costello
48W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.