← Search

Beth Hasty

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 68W–96L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history164 matches
W
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/Ring/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlee Henney
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Sass/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Koysza
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-21 · LCTA18/Bernstein/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Henney
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-16 · LCTA54/Foley/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria McTarnaghan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · LCTA54/Foley/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Adams
loading the estimate
6-5
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA18/Sass/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Cline
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-09-23 · LCTA39/Ring/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Keith
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · LCTA18/Sass/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Arden McKenzie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · LCTA18/Boyd/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danielle Richardson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · LCTA18/Sass/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Arrington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · LCTA40/Blankenship/Snee Farm · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Fifield
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-25 · LCTA18/Bernstein/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Ronk
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.9%
28W–23L · 53% of games
4.0
31.1%
19W–42L · 43.7% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.6% of games
7.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 46.6% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King