Teams

Team Batman

2026 OWB Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-09vs OWB/IchimasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesChun Chen / Dianna Dylewski vs Travis Sykes / Wendy Barbary3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Haack / Jeffrey Osborne vs Amy Brown / Brad Brown1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Bennett / Jolyn Curtis vs Brandon Bachman / Ashley Edmonds2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-09vs OWB/IchimasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Khairallah / Gregory Bennett vs Travis Sykes / Stephanie Westbrook1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Haack / Philip Hafdahl vs Amy Brown / Brad Brown4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTricia Hafdahl / Jeffrey Osborne vs Kati Hill / Kevin Dunworth1-6, 3-6
2026-05-02vs OWB/IchimasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesDianna Dylewski / Mark Violette vs Stephanie Westbrook / Justin Fox2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Sherman / Gregory Bennett vs Amy Brown / Brad Brown2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMikaela McManus / John Hooks vs Akiko Ichimasa / Lubomir Kaderjak6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-11vs OWB/IchimasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesTricia Hafdahl / Philip Hafdahl vs Charlotte Dunworth / Michael Johns6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesByron Cotton / Mikaela McManus vs Meg Castleberry / Kevin Dunworth4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Bennett / Megan Sherman vs Justin Fox / Stephanie Westbrook6-7, 2-6
2026-04-11vs OWB/IchimasaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Violette / Jennifer Schweikert vs Justin Fox / Ashley Edmonds3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTricia Hafdahl / Jeffrey Osborne vs Kevin Dunworth / Charlotte Dunworth2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChun Chen / Alicia Roberson vs Kati Hill / Michael Johns6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-14vs OWB/IchimasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesChun Chen / Dianna Dylewski vs Charlotte Dunworth / Lubomir Kaderjak1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Hafdahl / Tricia Hafdahl vs Brandon Bachman / Wendy Barbary2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Bennett / Jolyn Curtis vs Akiko Ichimasa / Kevin Dunworth2-6, 3-6
2026-03-14vs OWB/IchimasaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Hooks / Mikaela McManus vs Akiko Ichimasa / Lubomir Kaderjak6-4, 0-4
L#2 DoublesMark Violette / Dianna Dylewski vs Brandon Bachman / Ashley Edmonds0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTricia Hafdahl / Jeffrey Osborne vs Meg Castleberry / Michael Johns6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Lauren Haack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Tricia Hafdahl
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.00
Gregory Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.92
John Hooks
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.91
Mikaela McManus
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Byron Cotton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Mark Violette
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Chun Chen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Dianna Dylewski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Jolyn Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Alicia Roberson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Megan Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Philip Hafdahl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffrey Osborne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Schweikert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kristine Khairallah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mikaela McManus + John Hooks123 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Hafdahl + Jeffrey Osborne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
Tricia Hafdahl
8W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Gregory Bennett
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
John Hooks
67W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Mikaela McManus
81W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Byron Cotton
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Mark Violette
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Chun Chen
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Dianna Dylewski
50W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
Jolyn Curtis
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Alicia Roberson
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Megan Sherman
37W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Philip Hafdahl
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jeffrey Osborne
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Schweikert
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristine Khairallah
79W–55L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.