Teams

You can Kiss my Ace

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.45 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesTaylor Marr / Tina Woods vs Laura Hathaway / Angela Kane6-1, 6-3
2021-06-04vs Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Furgal / Angela Tomaszewski vs Stephanie Frauen / Andrea Henningsen7-5, 4-5
2021-06-01vs I can't - I have TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaula Garrison / Jill Holloman vs Angela Kane / Michelle Tenhaeff6-4, 6-3
2021-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Tomaszewski / Jennifer Graham vs Olivia O'Brien / Jacqueline Henry6-0, 7-5
2021-05-11vs I can't - I have TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaula Garrison / Stacie Kotter vs Jean Garrell / Ann Allen6-7, 2-6
2021-04-27vs Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTaylor Marr / Lisa Furgal vs Maribeth Burg / Kristen Ambrose6-2, 6-3
2021-04-06vs Volley GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaula Garrison / Tina Woods vs Stephanie Frauen / Laura Forster6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngela Tomaszewski / Caroline Mia Lee vs Abby Colucci / Caroline Chopus6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jill Holloman
published 4
3.51
Taylor Marr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Caroline Mia Lee
published 3.5
3.48
Christina Treacy
published 3.5
3.25
Anne Marie Randolph
published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Furgal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Paula Garrison
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Stacie Kotter
published
3.11
Julie Collier
published
3.09
Angela Tomaszewski
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Graham
published
2.97
Lauren Malone
published
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
2.83
Katie Plofchan
published
2.75
Anne McDonald
published 3
2.56
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Furgal + Angela Tomaszewski8851% games+9.2% vs expected
Caroline Mia Lee + Jill Holloman14660% games+6.0% vs expected
Taylor Marr + Jill Holloman314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Furgal + Christina Treacy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jill Holloman
155W–54L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.94
3.5
Taylor Marr
132W–47L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Caroline Mia Lee
46W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Christina Treacy
79W–43L career · no lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Anne Marie Randolph
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Lisa Furgal
204W–131L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Paula Garrison
115W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Stacie Kotter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
Julie Collier
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angela Tomaszewski
111W–105L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Graham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
Lauren Malone
12W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
2.97
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
2.90
Katie Plofchan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Anne McDonald
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Celeste Linthicum
3W–12L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
2.56
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.